Yes, it was the "From Man to Wolf-The Soul Path of the Stunning Heroine", it was speechless. In addition, the following is not a film review. It is purely because I read that film review and felt that the double label was too obvious.
(Upadate: Welcome to discuss the movie itself in the reply, but if it is a personal attack, thanks for not Min, delete it directly)
The film review said so boldly: "Werewolves are bloodthirsty only because of their natural nature, like raptor hunting. This is the law of nature and a link in the food chain. Can you say that they are immoral?" "Once a month? The hunt can be regarded as a carnival of werewolves. On the night of the full moon, the werewolves transform into their bodies and begin their hunting activities. This activity is both a regular predation and a crazy party." "I think the most The important point is that to deceive the farm is to satisfy the werewolf's slaughter psychology." I am surprised, isn't this a contradiction? While saying that this is just the basic food chain of animals, it is also said that it is a party of werewolves to satisfy their slaughter mentality. If Ryan’s team was to hunt the werewolves and die, what's wrong with the team of the male protagonist who was fooled by him? In the beginning, they didn't take the initiative to attack the werewolves. The werewolves were always chasing them. The antelope on the prairie is surrounded by wolves, and it will strike again. It is not moral or immoral here, it is the survival instinct. Their good brothers were hunted and killed by werewolves. The film review author said again: "The actor said it was a pity because I wanted to kill them all~ Other people agreed and smashed the family portrait with one hammer." In the eyes of the Virgin, this is what Human beings are self-centered and unwilling to tolerate. But the problem is that when you talk about werewolves, you talk about the food chain, and you talk about survival of the fittest; when you talk about people, you talk about human morality. Do they dare to sit down and have tea with the werewolves and negotiate well? Did the werewolves give them this opportunity? People don’t offend me, I don’t offend people. The werewolves have killed several brothers. Shouldn't the soldiers resist and avenge the brothers? How heartbroken that film review was, complaining that the protagonist team "has no mercy on the werewolves", and cited the evidence of "chopping hands, trying to kill them many times, and finally blasting everyone down, how cunning in some respects." No less than a werewolf’s ambush"-but the question is, how did the conflict between the protagonist and the werewolf come about? First, it was not this cannon fodder team that wanted to capture the werewolves, and they didn't even know it. Second, the cannon fodder team didn't go to the werewolf's house voluntarily, it was the werewolf who asked the heroine to trick them into their home. Didn’t you explain that this is the tradition of werewolf carnival? The werewolves just like to ask Megan to lead people to his own home. What should I do? To put it bluntly, just a Werewolf version of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and his home is a magic cave. Even according to the food chain of the animal kingdom, this is a willingness to bet and lose, and the wolf wants to eat the sheep, but the antelope is chosen. Isn't it what it should be? You have to analyze how innocent and helpless the heroine is, Despite the analysis, it is not guilty to pour sewage on this squad that has suffered for eight lifetimes. Ryan has said that they are the bait he designed and sent to death in vain. The Cannon Fodder Squad didn't even know about the military's hunting of werewolves, and thought it was an ordinary military exercise. What you see in their behavior is stupidity and human egocentricity, but what I see is brotherhood and perseverance. Except for the soldier who died and died at the beginning, the other five have lifelike personalities. The male protagonist has no human self-centeredness. The title of the movie is not even willing to kill a dog. Later, he also took care of the werewolf dog in the house. In the end, the bloody battle with the werewolf hurt both sides. It can only be said that the werewolf took a blind eye this time and encountered a terrible prey. Just allow the werewolves to survive the fittest to realize its food chain, and forbid the survival of the fittest to kill the werewolves? Magical logic? ! Magical truth? ! ------------------------------------ Update: That film review was added later, oops " Is it animal instinct to kill cats and mice for a while? Werewolves bloodthirsty is the nature of animals, and torture is also the nature of animals. Where is the contradiction? Besides, I didn’t say that I should not resist and deserve to be killed? I just look from the perspective of humanism. It’s just this movie. My personal understanding is different.” You really did “not say that you shouldn’t resist and deserve to be killed”, and what I’m wondering is just your bizarre double standard: why arewolves torture and kill people are the nature of animals, and the protagonist team also fights and kills. Are werewolves cruel? Could it be that the werewolves were driven to a desperate situation? Humans have to abide by many of the human ethics and laws-Dwarf Oil, let's not fight, sit down at a negotiating table and have a good talk. Does anyone give them this opportunity? Or catch the werewolf alive without harming the werewolf, and then make sense? At that time, the protagonist was in a disadvantaged position. Do you think they could be as powerful as Zhuge Liang's seven captures of Meng Huo? Now that you have "jumped out of the human-centered perspective to watch this movie", that's good, isn't this a life-and-death struggle between the predator and the predator among animals? As a result, the hunter gnawed hard bones this time and died on his own. Isn't it what it should be? The hunted also suffered heavy casualties. Only the male protagonist survived. As a result, some people harp and reflect on why the protagonist is so "relentless" and so self-centered. Emma, I really laughed out of my teeth The film review later added, oops, "Is it animal instinct to kill cats and mice for a while? Werewolves bloodthirsty is the nature of animals, and torture is also the nature of animals. What is the contradiction? In addition, I did not say that we should not resist. Are you killed? It’s just to watch this movie from a human-centered perspective. My personal understanding is different." You really "didn't say you shouldn't resist and deserve to be killed", and all I wonder is your bizarre double standard: Yes What is the nature of animals when a werewolf kills and tortures people, and it is cruel for the protagonist team to kill and torture a werewolf? Could it be that the werewolves were driven to a desperate situation? Humans have to abide by many of the human ethics and laws-Dwarf Oil, let's not fight, sit down at a negotiating table and have a good talk. Does anyone give them this opportunity? Or catch the werewolf alive without harming the werewolf, and then make sense? At that time, the protagonist was in a disadvantaged position. Do you think they could be as powerful as Zhuge Liang's seven captures of Meng Huo? Now that you have "jumped out of the human-centered perspective to watch this movie", that's good, isn't this a life-and-death struggle between the predator and the predator among animals? As a result, the hunter gnawed hard bones this time and died on his own. Isn't it what it should be? The hunted also suffered heavy casualties. Only the male protagonist survived. As a result, some people harp and reflect on why the protagonist is so "relentless" and so self-centered. Emma, I really laughed out of my teeth
View more about Dog Soldiers reviews
