Don’t take entertainment too seriously

Mae 2021-10-18 09:29:04

The current media is full of criticisms of the film "The Da Vinci Code", with novels as the main reference object, and more curses than applause. I believe that most of those who make irresponsible remarks about the movie while holding the novel and slanting their eyes are reading the Chinese translation of the original. And when I was attracted by this Chinese best-selling book last year, a friend with a PhD in English literature attacked me and said: "If you have English reading ability, you will definitely be suspicious of the standard of the Chinese translation." , I’m really worried. Ron Howard started from the English original and went to the left, and the Chinese translation started from the English original and went to the right. Those of us who read the Chinese translation took another turn, plus Plato back then When it comes to literature and art, it is "separated by three levels" from truth, and the "intentional misinterpretation" of the New Critics... Perhaps what we have in our minds and what we want to solve in the movie is not a "code" at all.
I have always hated this kind of contrast: novels and movies, originals and translations... Since different medium languages-text/lens, foreign language/Chinese, have seriously changed the characteristics of art, why not just treat it as a self-sufficient one What about the individual?
Movies have been commercial since they appeared in Hollywood. Art is just an additive. It is of course good to have it, but it does not affect the overall situation. In terms of commercial operation, the film "The Da Vinci Code" was a success. From religious disputes to filming was blocked, the ending was that the film was still amidst the scolding, but the box office soared, and even the tourism industry launched the "Code Journey" while it was hot. ", followed by fishing for it.
The film’s narrative of the novel hardly changed is probably the result of being in the shadow of the huge success of the best-selling book, and due to the limitations of the film itself, Ron Howard had to work hard to express some of the books in the book that was a bit boring. In historical and theoretical passages, the tension of the picture has to be used to replace the mental thrillers in the novel... So although in this sense, the film "The Da Vinci Code" is not at least a failed adaptation of the work, but if If you are obsessed with novels, it will still disappoint. In fact, this kind of appeal itself is superfluous. If you really love literature, you should have known for a long time that the pleasure brought by images is cheap and low-level compared to reading text. Just think about how rare adaptations of famous works in the history of film have been generally praised. Not to mention that this is just a suspenseful story that is popular and popular.
Dan Brown never had the luxury of wanting to write serious literary books. The novel "The Da Vinci Code" is a popular business book from narrative, structure to distribution operation, but the theme and religious color of the story have increased the prestige of the less popular novel genre. Strict reasoning challenges the intelligence of the audience, and the strong religious and art history background adds infinite cultural flavor to a popular book. Naturally, people who are accustomed to urban romances or Stephen King’s thriller stories are attracted by these auras, which at least give the general public who are essentially incomprehensible a kind of seemingly deep reading pleasure. As a result, the novel "The Da Vinci Code" became a hit.
However, the rapid response of the religious community has once again contributed to the "Da Vinci Code" series of products. To be honest, in the past few years, religious people who are deeply rooted in simplicity have often fought with the mass media. From the film adaptation of the banned book "The Last Temptation of Christ" to the controversial "Passion of the Christ" filmed by Mel Gibson. Like "The Da Vinci Code", vowed to "pull the divine Christ off the altar." Is this trend not only in the religious world? Not long ago, the movie "Troy" and the new film "Tristan and Yser", which were bought a lot not long ago, turned epic myths into modern stories—the battle of honor has become a battle of power and color, and the magic of destiny has become Love for a long time-which one is not to please modern audiences who are really lacking in imagination? Because today, no one seems to believe in divinity anymore.
In fact, some movies require some background knowledge, because not all stories are repeats of urban legends that you are familiar with. The film "The Da Vinci Code" has some religious and art history backgrounds, but some are distorted by the film, and some are just gimmicks of popular culture. If you have never read a novel, and lack a little background knowledge, I dare to make a guarantee. There are definitely quite a few people who don't understand it, and can't even connect the plot that is too tight. It is estimated that the most rewarding result is that seeing the epaulettes of the soldiers again is a snicker in the heart, or next time you have to carefully examine whether there is a cup on the table in the famous painting "The Last Supper"?

View more about The Da Vinci Code reviews

Extended Reading

The Da Vinci Code quotes

  • Robert Langdon: Have you ever heard those words before, Sophie, "so dark the con of man"?

    Sophie Neveu: No. Have you?

    Robert Langdon: When you were a child, were you aware of any secret gatherings? Anything ritualistic in nature? Meetings your grandfather would have wanted kept secret? Was there ever any talk of something called the Priory of Sion?

    Sophie Neveu: The what? Why are you asking these things?

    Robert Langdon: The Priory of Sion is a myth. One of the world's oldest and most secret societies with leaders like, uh, Sir Isaac Newton, da Vinci himself. The fleur-de-lis is their crest. They're guardians of a secret they supposedly refer to as "the dark con of man."

    Sophie Neveu: But what secret?

    Robert Langdon: The Priory of Sion protects the source of God's power on Earth.

  • Andre Vernet: Forgive the intrusion. I'm afraid the police arrived more quickly than I anticipated. You must follow me, please. For your own safety.

    Sophie Neveu: You knew they were coming?

    Andre Vernet: My guard alerted me to your status when you arrived. Yours is one of our oldest and highest-level accounts. It includes a safe-passage clause.

    Robert Langdon: Safe passage?

    Andre Vernet: [opening the back of an armored truck] If you step inside, please. Time is of the essence.

    Robert Langdon: [nervously, seeing the limited space available] In there?