Don’t take entertainment too seriously

Mae 2021-10-18 09:29:04

The current media is full of criticisms of the film "The Da Vinci Code", with novels as the main reference object, and more curses than applause. I believe that most of those who make irresponsible remarks about the movie while holding the novel and slanting their eyes are reading the Chinese translation of the original. And when I was attracted by this Chinese best-selling book last year, a friend with a PhD in English literature attacked me and said: "If you have English reading ability, you will definitely be suspicious of the standard of the Chinese translation." , I’m really worried. Ron Howard started from the English original and went to the left, and the Chinese translation started from the English original and went to the right. Those of us who read the Chinese translation took another turn, plus Plato back then When it comes to literature and art, it is "separated by three levels" from truth, and the "intentional misinterpretation" of the New Critics... Perhaps what we have in our minds and what we want to solve in the movie is not a "code" at all.
I have always hated this kind of contrast: novels and movies, originals and translations... Since different medium languages-text/lens, foreign language/Chinese, have seriously changed the characteristics of art, why not just treat it as a self-sufficient one What about the individual?
Movies have been commercial since they appeared in Hollywood. Art is just an additive. It is of course good to have it, but it does not affect the overall situation. In terms of commercial operation, the film "The Da Vinci Code" was a success. From religious disputes to filming was blocked, the ending was that the film was still amidst the scolding, but the box office soared, and even the tourism industry launched the "Code Journey" while it was hot. ", followed by fishing for it.
The film’s narrative of the novel hardly changed is probably the result of being in the shadow of the huge success of the best-selling book, and due to the limitations of the film itself, Ron Howard had to work hard to express some of the books in the book that was a bit boring. In historical and theoretical passages, the tension of the picture has to be used to replace the mental thrillers in the novel... So although in this sense, the film "The Da Vinci Code" is not at least a failed adaptation of the work, but if If you are obsessed with novels, it will still disappoint. In fact, this kind of appeal itself is superfluous. If you really love literature, you should have known for a long time that the pleasure brought by images is cheap and low-level compared to reading text. Just think about how rare adaptations of famous works in the history of film have been generally praised. Not to mention that this is just a suspenseful story that is popular and popular.
Dan Brown never had the luxury of wanting to write serious literary books. The novel "The Da Vinci Code" is a popular business book from narrative, structure to distribution operation, but the theme and religious color of the story have increased the prestige of the less popular novel genre. Strict reasoning challenges the intelligence of the audience, and the strong religious and art history background adds infinite cultural flavor to a popular book. Naturally, people who are accustomed to urban romances or Stephen King’s thriller stories are attracted by these auras, which at least give the general public who are essentially incomprehensible a kind of seemingly deep reading pleasure. As a result, the novel "The Da Vinci Code" became a hit.
However, the rapid response of the religious community has once again contributed to the "Da Vinci Code" series of products. To be honest, in the past few years, religious people who are deeply rooted in simplicity have often fought with the mass media. From the film adaptation of the banned book "The Last Temptation of Christ" to the controversial "Passion of the Christ" filmed by Mel Gibson. Like "The Da Vinci Code", vowed to "pull the divine Christ off the altar." Is this trend not only in the religious world? Not long ago, the movie "Troy" and the new film "Tristan and Yser", which were bought a lot not long ago, turned epic myths into modern stories—the battle of honor has become a battle of power and color, and the magic of destiny has become Love for a long time-which one is not to please modern audiences who are really lacking in imagination? Because today, no one seems to believe in divinity anymore.
In fact, some movies require some background knowledge, because not all stories are repeats of urban legends that you are familiar with. The film "The Da Vinci Code" has some religious and art history backgrounds, but some are distorted by the film, and some are just gimmicks of popular culture. If you have never read a novel, and lack a little background knowledge, I dare to make a guarantee. There are definitely quite a few people who don't understand it, and can't even connect the plot that is too tight. It is estimated that the most rewarding result is that seeing the epaulettes of the soldiers again is a snicker in the heart, or next time you have to carefully examine whether there is a cup on the table in the famous painting "The Last Supper"?

View more about The Da Vinci Code reviews

Extended Reading
  • Guadalupe 2022-03-22 09:01:10

    In terms of plot, the original is more exciting. The actor's performance is a bonus item.

  • Zella 2022-04-23 07:01:10

    Books are better than movies.

The Da Vinci Code quotes

  • Robert Langdon: There was every orb conceivable on that tomb except one. The orb which fell from the heavens and inspired Newton's life's work. Work that incurred the wrath of the Church... until his dying day. A-P-P-L-E. Apple.

  • Sophie Neveu: Maybe there is something about this Priory of Sion.

    Robert Langdon: I hope not. Any Priory story ends in bloodshed. They were butchered by the Church. It all started over a thousand years ago when a French king conquered the holy city of Jerusalem. This crusade, one of the most massive and sweeping in history, was actually orchestrated by a secret brotherhood, the Priory of Sion and their military arm, the Knights Templar.

    Sophie Neveu: But the Templars were created to protect the Holy Land.

    Robert Langdon: That was a cover to hide their true goal, according to this myth. Supposedly the invasion was to find an artifact lost since the time of Christ. An artifact, it was said, the Church would kill to possess.

    Sophie Neveu: Did they find it, this buried treasure?

    Robert Langdon: Put it this way: One day the Templars simply stopped searching. They quit the Holy Land and traveled directly to Rome. Whether they blackmailed the papacy or the Church bought their silence, no one knows. But it is a fact the papacy declared these Priory knights, these Knights Templar, of limitless power. By the 1300s, the Templars had grown *too* powerful. Too threatening. So the Vatican issued secret orders to be opened simultaneously all across Europe. The Pope had declared the Knights Templar Satan worshipers and said God had charged *him* with cleansing the earth of these heretics. The plan went off like clockwork. The Templars were all but exterminated. The date was October 13th, 1307. A Friday.

    Sophie Neveu: Friday the 13th.

    Robert Langdon: The Pope sent troops to claim the Priory's treasure, but they found nothing. The few surviving Knights of the Priory had vanished, and the search for their sacred artifact began again.

    Sophie Neveu: What artifact? I've never heard about any of this.

    Robert Langdon: Yes, you have. Almost everyone on earth has. You just know it as the Holy Grail.