The absurdity of religion is not absurd. Blind obedience is

Clementine 2021-12-24 08:01:42

I saw a lot of comments from people who think that Bill Maher is sensational. I interviewed a few hillbillies and wanted to overthrow the meaning of religion. I think they didn’t understand why Bill did it. They didn’t understand it or didn’t want to. understand the

goodness of the role of religion is self-evident but Bill wants to be noted that in these religions has a gorgeous appearance while the dark side --- part of people with ulterior motives is that these blind supporters to achieve their evil purpose

in Bill Maher live in a world of contradiction is the main contradiction between the Christian world and the Islamic world two religions in one aspect of Church and State has done very well result in a thorough brainwashing capacity of these countries is very strong religious

many people not know much about the other side of the United States Fortunately, there are many small cities and small towns in the center of big cities. There is a church a few blocks away. There are countless churches in some residential areas. People in these small places are indeed not as educated as the residents of big cities such as New York and Chicago. had also limited the Christian world that they received small big things from this in terms of US forces in Europe is not entirely Christian can compare

the Europeans relatively loose respect for nature which is why Bill can not find a religious preacher at the Vatican Most of the people he interviewed in the United States were not willing to face Bill's doubts, because even if these people really had their own doubts, they had to consider other people's views and influence on them after the film was broadcast. The main supporter of the U.S. Republican Party is These low-educated Christians have a lot of Democratic elites in the Democratic Party, but many people with higher education do not believe in religion. This is a major drawback in political propaganda. This is why the Democratic Party composed of elites can't fight the Republican Party because In the U.S. elite is also a minority, most people are still believers. When a woman voted in the movie, she said that she voted for Bush because of his beliefs.

Bill’s own talk show, Real Time, is also based on political satire, and he is not a one-sided supporter of the elite Democratic Party. If you use neutral to describe Bill, I think it’s a misunderstanding of him. Bill believes in the power of reason, no matter which one it is. He has things to say about the parties and should be ironic and never retain his venomous tongue, but it is obvious that the Republican Party can provide more spit material, from the Bush era to Sarah Palin to the Tea Party and then to the Republican Party to show the lower limit of brain damage. We can all see the ridiculous remarks of these conservatives, and the main basis of these people’s brain-disabled remarks is Christian doctrine and others, such as the Republican Party. Some people are opposed to higher education. The reason is that young people in the United States have received college education. After that, most people no longer firmly believe in Christianity. In the United States, universities are not like the Chinese. People who enter universities for higher education are still a few. Bill has ridiculed the Republican Party’s brain damage and ridiculed the Democratic Party is all elites but often fails. Here I just want to explain Bill. stance

As for Islam Needless to say, in fact, we think with the mind also know that radical sect and Bill when he went to interview those who are just in front of the media actually represent peace in private fully endorsed the radical doctrines me deeply that in the Islamic world The status of women is also obvious. In the film, Muslims say that in order to accept, they must accept every detail in the Islamic story. You can also imagine the toughness of this sect. In the

Mormon documentary, it is just mentioned by the way, even if only by the way. To mention that we can also see what this sect is,

whether it is political disputes or various conflicts in reality, and the losses caused by these conflicts do exist. These meaningless conflicts are the focus of Bill Maher’s opposition. It is also the reason why he made this film. Bill believes in absolute sanity, so he always looks suspicious. It does make many people uncomfortable. But the religion he explained is a virtue that does not require thinking. Of course, we may think that after watching it. A kind-hearted and faithful ordinary person is much easier. What we cannot deny is that the conflict between the apocalypse believed by Christianity and the end of the world believed by Islam has brought a negative impact on the world.

His documentary is not to oppose religion, but to explain how much religion has an impact in the process of human cannibalism, and these meaningless fights are the thorns that have plagued Bill for many years. I don’t think many people understand this. The significance of this documentary, but I am also very pleased to see many of my fellow colleagues

God bless us. And we should bless ourselves more.

View more about Religulous reviews

Extended Reading

Religulous quotes

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] What about when innocent people get killed during a "defensive action"?

    Michael Bray: I'm for that. Yeah. It's collateral damage.

    Bill Maher: But it's acceptable?

    Michael Bray: We've got to consider what the real issue is here and what the cost is and the risk.

  • Bill Maher: [Extra] This is the Anne Frank house, when you see it you really understand how true that phrase "The banality of evil" really is. One of the common arguments in defence of religion is that Hitler wasn't religious and neither was Stalin or Mao and they were bad so religion is good. But like religion itself it's an argument that really depends a lot on not thinking too deeply. For one Hitler himself didn't eliminate anyone personally he had a lot of footsoldiers most of whom were good Christians and they pushed people into the ovens. Religion has done a bad job of stepping up and preventing violence-prone bullies from doing their thing. If anything it usually justifies acts of madness. And 20th Century Fascism and Communism while not strictly religions as we've come to think of religion, really were religions. They were state religions. Hitler was seen as infallable and Godlike. Hirohito was absolutely a God on Earth to the Japanese people. We shouldn't get too hung up on the word religion. The bottom line is whether people think and act rationally or not and whenever they organise their lives around something that could best be described as groundlessness bad things happen. Even if the central story seems harmless like there's a God who loves you so much that he had his only Son whacked so that you could keep on sinning. Still, doesn't matter, once reality has left the building, once it's up there in the ether then anything can be extrapolated or tacked on by Preachers and Priesthoods and delusionals and power-hungry pricks. It's not that big a step from "your God is the only God and he loves you very much" to "you really should get out there and start killing for him" Whenever people believe in something utterly groundless because they were told it by a charismatic preacher and Hitler was nothing if not that, all bets are off. Nazism was a religion, a religion based on the insane fiction that Jews were subhuman vermin who did not deserve to live, but people and people not from a primitive society believed it because A they liked the preacher, B the other sheep around them were buying into it even though it was crazy and C it was inextricably tied to their view of a glorious Valhalla-like future. A, B, C. Religion.