I don't want to have no life when I die.

Else 2021-12-06 19:20:54



The Death Poetry Society said

how to spend the life of a teenager before it can become a life? I'm afraid no one knows. This is not a physical experiment. Under the same conditions, it can be done again. seize the day? Or follow the path established by the parents? When choosing A, can anyone really guarantee that it is the life to spend?

When trying to discuss the ultimate question of life, we have actually entered a vicious circle where it is impossible to find an answer. What should be spent? Money? Conquer the world? Or an easy life, full of children and grandchildren? No matter which answer, there is the same theme-that is happiness, comfort, victory or whatever we think is good. But can we continue to ask, should happiness be a goal? Is a painful life also worth trying? Is sleeping on the street also a kind of life? No one has ever tried to aim for this, but no one has never felt disappointed because of missing such an experience.

The so-called happiness may only be the standard of being enlightened. It cannot be denied that the reason for such a standard should be summarized from the countless failures or successes of mankind over thousands of years. Because such a goal can make the world run in a more orderly manner and allow humans to develop and live better. But the next question is: why is it so? Because of the nature of the human race? If we still want to eat and eat, if we want to do it, the answer is correct. But sadly, humans have thoughts. Then you can choose your own life and control your behavior. Since then, the rules of animals no longer suit us. But we are still lazy to live with animal goals.

Once questioned by a drunk father: Do you know who your father worked so hard for? Of course I know the standard answer. But I don't want to answer, because I have never understood this complicated question. So I asked, for whom are you working hard? Answer for my son, you can see that he really said so. I didn't say anything because I didn't want to embarrass the father here. But fathers who work hard to live a better life for their children, and even fathers who have worked hard for this goal, have you ever wondered why? Because if you don’t work hard, your offspring will suffer? Then why should there be offspring? Because his father's generation lived like this, so? I created a child for an unknown reason (let's consider it to reproduce offspring), and then work hard for this task that I don't know why, even from the time I was a child.

Many people say that life is suffering, but they still choose to let another life suffer in this world. If you really choose your own life on your own, there should be many people who choose absurdity, and if absurdity, there should be fewer people who will suffer. There should be people who worry that humans will become less and less until they disappear, but what about it? Everyone has experienced their own life, and no one comes to this good or bad world to suffer or get a golden key. Everyone has lived. After that, there will be no more people, no more people discussing the boring unanswered question of life. Is there anything wrong? no.

Besides, who would say that that would be worse? Will zebras who have never been able to develop family planning sustainably be happier? Is the giant panda worried about its extinction? Are they happy? Are they unfortunate? Do they care? Only people will worry about this.



Should I be sad when Neil found the way to liberation with a bullet? Maybe he has found the true meaning of seize the day and found what he really should grasp. Maybe he laughed at his sad companion somewhere, the group of companions who resisted hard but didn't find this way, maybe he should be envious. maybe.

The question discussed later, of course, who should be responsible for his death, the school? Keating? parents? Or the "brave" self?

Indeed, when a young man like me is asked to think about what to do, it is mostly "dangerous". The blockbuster above probably explains what it is, ha ha. When Wilton College has gone through the established "successful" education model for nearly a hundred years, when Neal has been bound for so long and never doubted the established path, Keating's appearance was wrong. . He wants to sow the seeds of freedom, but there is no free soil. It must bring oppression and resistance. When the child pops out of the chamber, this is no longer a story about freedom. It is just a collision of two worldviews that should not appear at the same time. Any one of them can achieve a life by itself, but it is dangerous to work together.

In fact, such a group of young people are only pursuing opinions that oppose the convention. They found an idol and went on a different path just like the previous regulations. When the Todds finally stand on the table, the second one stands on the table, and the third stands on the table. After almost half of them stand on the table, will the next person stand up because of faith? Are all cowards who succumbed to the school? Maybe...

View more about Dead Poets Society reviews

Extended Reading

Dead Poets Society quotes

  • John Keating: Language was developed for one endeavor, and that is... Mr. Anderson? Come on, are you a man or an amoeba?

    [Todd stays silent]

    John Keating: Mr. Perry?

    Neil Perry: To communicate.

    John Keating: No! To woo women!

  • Neil Perry: [quoting Henry David Thoreau] "I went to the woods because I wanted to live deliberately. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life."

    Charlie Dalton: I'll second that.

    Neil Perry: "To put to rout all that was not life; and not, when I had come to die, discover that I had not lived."