We can only sleep peacefully at night when people realize that gender traits are just organs and not classes.
Recently, I turned to the composition I wrote in the previous English test. I wrote about the after-view of the movie "Love to Paris". After reading it, I felt that there are many points worth discussing in the article.
The original translation is as follows:
First of all, in the second paragraph of the article, "depicting patriarchal society from an objective perspective" can be completely replaced by "normalizing patriarchal society", but I didn't do that because I painted "normalization" and "rationalization" Equals. In fact, the two concepts are not the same: in my opinion, rationalizing patriarchy in a film portrays the male group as supreme, absolutely correct; while in a film normalizing patriarchy , will tell that men and women, like women, are equally embarrassed under the weight of such deformities.
In addition, if you change the article a few words, you will find that it has a reversal of criticizing the female protagonist and licking the male power-in fact, this is the original motivation for writing this article. What I've seen in movies before is the heroine and her narrow values and outlook on happiness - "I depend on this man for the happiness of my life" - and how the heroine still relies on a man when she becomes beautiful and confident in Paris style. But this may be because I was blinded by egalitarianism, mistakenly regarded the heroine's life mentor as a diamond scumbag, and mistakenly regarded a person's pursuit of happiness as too narrow and single.
This article got me thinking about the gender movement in society today. In today's society, patriarchy is prevalent, so the movement to provide women with various personal protection and rights protection came into being. All of this makes sense to me, but the rise of feminism is so bizarre. Any attempt to make the distribution of power unequal should be absolutely prohibited. If feminism makes women as ignorant and authoritarian as men are today, how is it different from patriarchy? If feminism makes men's values and mate choice too single, how can we get rid of the dilemma of the negative-sum game? However, as far as the current society is concerned, such a deformed existence as feminism is just a timely rain, neutralizing the distortions caused by the existing patriarchy to people.
But what really worries me is the way people treat women's rights and equality equally. If egalitarianism in this society is overkill, it could easily move in the direction of feminism, and then we may welcome the return of male power to balance the uneven distribution of power again. However, the real solution that can be done once and for all will definitely not be a seesaw between men's rights and women's rights, but the real rise of egalitarianism. We can only sleep peacefully at night when people realize that gender traits are just organs and not classes.
I hope that every David can meet Sabrina who respects him, and I hope that every David can make his Sabrina feel truly safe.
mutual encouragement.
View more about Sabrina reviews
