After watching the documentary, I have some thoughts that I don't feel comfortable with. Most of the following are my own conjectures.
Question one, why did Bob do this interview?
He has not given any interviews, and his lawyer has warned him that the matter is harmful and unhelpful, and he has been interviewed.
He did not give interviews all the year round, until he was old, did he want to reveal the truth? You feel that you have been "playing" with the public for so long, "can't find your confidant", and want to share your own voice?
Question 2. Why did Bob say "kill them all" when he was in the bathroom at the end?
Possibly one, he didn't know he had wheat on him. Tell the truth. (I was skeptical. In the previous episode, in the middle of the interview, he thought that no one heard his voice, but Mai was still listening, and his lawyer reminded him that the person who did such a “clean” case in the three cases would not hear him. will miss this detail)
Possibly two, he knew that he had wheat on his body, he lied for some purpose, maybe he still wanted to play with others
Possibly three, he knew that he had wheat on his body, he told the truth, combined with the first paragraph, he was old and wanted to find someone to share what he had committed.
Possibly fourth, he knew that he had wheat on his body, and he told the truth, but he knew that in this case it was a secret recording, and the recorded content could not be regarded as evidence. Just told the truth.
Maybe five, the handwriting is already deadly evidence, he doesn't care, he told the truth.
There are still some places where I am very afraid, and I only state some of my conjectures here.
View more about The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst reviews
