All human actions need a "starting point". The so-called starting point is the point that is believed to be true.
This point is always biased - unbiased observations do not exist; this bias may or may not be corrected - but whatever the facts may be, the truth of the starting point varies from person to person difference in degree, and a greater truth to the qualities of things to good men. At this time, if the person's three views are basically correct, that is, he loves what he should love, he hates what he should hate, and what he knows is good, that is, if he is not what Confucius called more than a thief Bad people: If the mind is wise and dangerous, the action is prudent and firm, the hypocrisy is arguing, the ugly is rich, and the wrong is smooth, then the result of his practice will be good.
The protagonist of this film is such a person. When he walks through the flickering world as a good person, of course he will look wrong. In the story, against the background of laws, institutions and ordinary people, it seems that he looks wrong more often than not. Not a lot, but he still holds onto the world rather than letting the world throw him at will. He doesn't have good eyesight - an operator who can only hear voice can be seen as an interesting metaphor, but in the world of voice we are watching his vision "the way it goes wrong" and listening represents the mind And the operation of the brain, I saw the initiative and sensitivity of his mind, and the stagnation and regret of his thoughts. There is only one point, this person is acting on the basis of something called virtue.
Even, I don't mean to say that he is a good policeman, a good husband, and a good father, because playing those roles is not determined by virtue, some involve others, some involve the institutional arrangements of the country, and involve luck. But he was a good man, and he made himself easy to submit to the good he saw every moment, and along the way he might be sinful, but he would not fall into a wicked man. Writing this, I do a little research in my head, and it's hard not to think of "Eavesdropping Storm".
The woman who was finally saved, in this sense, is a similar person to him, the difference is that this is a "good mad person", we can't see what her madness is, but she is very similar to Asia Rristotle pointed to the "excessive" situation that is often studied first when the middle way is located, and she, as an extreme, pointed out the limitations of the "good" mentioned in this article: good people can become demons as well as bad people, as long as we put "Seeking truth" is regarded as an object rather than a methodology. As long as we think that truth is a conclusion rather than a discovery, then the greatest good man is the craziest man who can do the most terrible things.
beep, good night.
View more about The Guilty reviews
