In fact, it looks good from the beginning, including the reversal of the plot, the process of Ed's first "betrayal" and then turning into a "good guy" is still okay, including the special effects. It is very good as a film in 2005.
But it was a bit unacceptable when it entered the Russian field. The typical theme of the United States, thinking that you are the big brother, you violated the airspace of other countries, and you just started without a word? Isn't this provoking a third world war? If you go to another country and say you kill people, you will kill people. You can do it out of self-protection, but exm? ? The BGM and the depiction of the picture all show the heroic feeling of escaping from the dead after "killing the enemy".
So your life is life, but other people's life is not life? It makes sense to go to another country to kill people, and it is so heroic that it is either a screenwriter or a director.
If there is no such chaotic logic of violating national rights, it feels like 7 points, but I'm sorry, I can only give 1 star for this!
View more about Stealth reviews
