When I first joined the animation company and was a beginner as a screenwriter, the director of the company, an old Jianghu, must be called Eisenstein and Stanislavsky, and "Battleship Potemkin" (once mistakenly called "Poemkin") Tekin") was the film he mentioned the most, but at that time I didn't understand all of them. The director was influenced by the Soviet Union's set of director performance theory, but I was a half-way monk, so I could only keep silent. To express admiration for him like a surging river. Until today, N years later, I finally got to know the true face of Mount Lu.
Movies in the silent era were basically divided into chapters, right? Seeing this kind of division today is like interrupting the narrative, pulling the audience out of empathy and making a play. The subtitles explain the meaning, so that the audience does not understand, but the more subtitles, the more it affects the audience's perception. The soundtrack is alright, I will be enjoying a symphony performance, and I think that Disney's "Tom and Jerry" is often accompanied by similar music, which is very emotional.
The part of the ladder is definitely a classic. The brave retrograde fell at the gunpoint in the end, and the Cossack cavalry is really a nightmare for many people. Many years ago, when the Turghut Ministry returned to Middle Earth, it was also killed by the Cossacks. Played badly.
In the end, the black-and-white film just got a red flag. How did this happen (it turned out to be hand-painted on the copy, strong)?
This film fully embodies what the human sea tactics are. Zhang Yimou and others also learned from the film theory of the former Soviet Union, so it is not difficult to understand that Zhang Yimou likes to use the human sea tactics.
View more about Battleship Potemkin reviews
