After watching the movie, I realized that it doesn't matter if the poster is rooted in the story of the movie. The submarine was not stranded at all, and it was frozen.
At first, I felt that the story was very similar to the Red October, and then I felt that this was a film that was completely completed by the director's imagination, but I have to say that submarines and naval battles are very mysterious fields. For destroyers, submarines, The respective functions and weaponry of the aircraft carrier battle groups are mysteries, and the ways and rescues of submarines participating in naval battles are even more mysterious.
The risk that an airtight iron pot has to bear in the deep sea is huge, and it is even more difficult when the submarine has to go through various monitoring and avoid standard weapons. Detailed interpretation and explanation, as a non-military fan, the submarine is really like a target.
War movies always take place between the United States and Russia, and the United States is a god-like existence. At the end of the movie, I can't help but ask, when the president is alone on the enemy warship, should the vice president perform the presidential duties? Should the captured president be obeyed or should the war be fought in time to avoid further losses?
wake up? Wake up! This is a movie. Only then can the four-person combat team directly break into the military forbidden area without being discovered, and can directly rescue and take away the president.
View more about Hunter Killer reviews
