At first, I thought it was the daily life of a male artist, but it was a little dull in addition to the novelty
The whole film is full of opposites and contradictions, the silence and noise at the beginning and the end, the negation before and after the daily speech, the back to the person watching the concert to find someone
Keep blowing up to reveal peace, still hidden pistols in the park, corpses behind trees, or a collection of contradictions (but I actually saw the corpses at the beginning...)
The guitar smashed at the concert, the crazy play of the two women, and various elements made the later process of the film tend to be crazy and perverted. At the end, all the photos disappeared, except for the one pointing to the body, but the body was also gone, as if nothing was missing, the rhythm gradually silent
At the end, the little white faces pretend to play tennis, and the male protagonist has a voice after picking up the ball, which echoes the scene before going to the park, making people seem to enter an indistinguishable truth, it seems that the evidence is solid, but it may be all a fantasy
ps so what's the matter with the corpse looking like a painting? The male protagonist and the female are cheating with another male? What does "they shot him" mean? After the photo was stolen, the conversation between men and women is full of pits... still not filled...
Update: After reading the movie review, I understand it better.
First of all, the movie is not finished, Director An... Let's call it that first... Very self-willed to spend money in places that mortals don't understand, and then the plot is not finished, many pits can be understood without filling
Then the film critics and the short reviews said in unison that group identification makes things have their value, which makes sense and fits the theme. But I personally think that there may be psychological factors in the middle, that is, the influence of the group on the individual makes the individual change, so the voice will be heard in the end...
Add some pictures:
London was too modern back then, when we were preparing to launch a revolution in full swing, to find out the capitalist roaders and revisionists among us...
In fact, there is nothing, and there is no point in the whole film. It may be because the era is relatively early, and the boldness and openness are admired? Anyway, people cut 2333 when it was released in foreign countries
Xiaochuangang camera: These two really startled me. When I saw this at the time, I thought of a follow-up plot, but it was determined that it was a gangster shot after there was no follow-up.
View more about Blow-Up reviews
