Ever since I was a child, a memory has always puzzled me, whether I ever killed a little girl and buried her body before I was 12 years old. After watching the movie, no more confusion: I definitely didn't kill, it was a nightmare of course. Because the first time I saw what it was like to kill in a movie, and I didn't even have a shovel.
Usually movies show murder scenes that are either fleeting or very artistic. As for the killing methods in this film, many of them are hard-hearted and usually hold their throats with both hands until they die. The whole process is shocking, and it is impossible for people with a weak heart to insist on doing this. So as the old judge said in Hirokazu Kore-eda's film "The Third Suspect", killing and not killing people are decided from birth.
"Twelve Citizens" "If I want to kill you, it must be that I won't kill you, it's just an angry remark" reflects the weak and bully people. What this film is about is that everyone has a tiger in their hearts.
All the fierce places in this film are just broken by the director and smashed to give you a deeper impression. The parts that really need to excavate human nature have been clearly explained in the narration. So I naturally don't need to repeat these scenarios. I understand that the film can be divided into three parts:
Arouse the "tiger" in my heart
restore man's original animal nature
Bestiality and Humanity will coexist
Going to war at a disagreement is a common method used by screenwriters, and this film fully uses the goddess to turn over and over again to evoke a weak and wild nature.
Different people have different depths of wild burial. There may be different manifestations, such as appetite, greed, material desire, etc. Some people do it in a way to end themselves, and some people do it in a way that hurts others. In essence, they are all wild or willful.
We usually refer to those who are wild and uncontrollable as mental illnesses or perverts. People should abide by the law, and people should not be out of line. At work, they should listen to their leaders and their family members after get off work. People who are disobedient and disobedient are usually miserable.
This film expresses the animality of human beings to the extreme: killing the same kind.
But here, please don't confuse one point: killing one's own kind among human beings is a person who can't control his animal nature and is different from other people of his kind. In the animal kingdom, the one who kills the same kind is the same animal as the other kind who can control its own animal nature.
After all, animals are born to survive and reproduce and grow their own species. It's just that the status quo of human beings reflects the original attributes of human beings. It's like if cats should hunt more or have more closeness to people.
If human beings were born to hunt and fight, then perhaps their character is indeed repressed and distorted. If human beings are born to be cute, then once there is a person who is not cute, it is the right thing to put him to death, and then the living people continue to be cute.
What happens to the same kind of animals that kills in their own species?
First of all, this non-gregarious animal, because it is in the group, can easily avoid the barriers of head-on conflict with other groups, and realize its own will. For example, the murderer in this film did not confront head-on through professional fighting, but carried out sneak attacks through nasty means.
This reminds me of one of my London robberies, three to one. One of the three was caught, pleaded guilty and sentenced to four years in prison. Obviously, this kind of non-positive attitude does not need to be very clever. As long as certain conditions prevail, it can easily succeed. Three hits one, with equipment, I'm unarmed, I'm sure I can beat him, but after two runs and one left, I can face it. When the police come to my side, I will have the upper hand, and the thief will not be able to escape.
Back in the film, he killed the weak and weak of the same kind by gaining the upper hand on the condition that his physical strength was not lost, and almost all of them escaped easily. Why does God favor such a scum? Why did the French Open Huihui fail to arrest them in time? Ordinary people do not kill their own kind, because of morality, weakness, or fear of being punished? Or won't you be pissed off at all?
Before I was 23 years old, I had no desires at all. I was a pure-hearted person with few desires. I thought about how to help others every day, and I just had to eat. Not to quarrel with anyone. Nor would he take the initiative to pursue fame and fortune, at that time he was indifferent to fame and fortune.
The first murder in the film can be said to be impulsive. Killing someone for the first time is bound to bring pain and anxiety. The explanation given in the film is that as the unease reaches its peak, only by killing people can it be calmed down. I remember there is a point of view that once you cheat, you will cheat again, because the feeling of cheating is too exciting. In fact, it is not the stimulation of cheating, but the cheating awakens the inner tiger and stimulates the animal nature of human beings. The guilt that comes with cheating the first time will go back to another person because of the inner strength. Just pure desire, but not cheating.
So according to this inference, serial killers, from the very beginning, are carrying guilt and keep killing. Conscience is not only not exhausted, but it is more entangled and painful every time. Of course, it was impossible for him to hold back, or to transfer or release by appropriate means, so he committed murders again and again. And as the number of murders increases, the techniques become more proficient.
Serial killers began to create with the beastly outbursts again and again. Where did the inspiration for the creation come from? Enough relaxation, even a state close to blurred. It can be seen from the killer's works again and again that the level of his works is getting more and more shocking.
The film disproves this point from another angle. The killer tried to build his own house many times, but it was repeatedly demolished. When building a house, it symbolizes the suppression of animal nature, and as a result, even if there is a sufficient budget, it is impossible to produce a work that satisfies oneself.
A 100% animalistic person, obviously society will not accept him, beyond the moral and legal bottom line is inevitable. A person who is 100% human can live very harmoniously in a gregarious society, but he must have no works.
Of course, having works does not mean killing people. Rather, it means that a murderer becomes inspired when he is in a relaxed state. Under the premise of legality, you can still do something out of the ordinary but not derail to find inspiration.
After the age of 23, I will fight for the rights of others and myself through some controlled actions, not just "going around". The current size can be grasped better. For example, when I recently had dinner in a shopping plaza with a friend in a wheelchair, I had to take a straight ladder to the second floor. An old man who was in line behind my friend squeezed in the moment the elevator opened, ignoring the women and children who were coming out. I was stopped. This old man insisted that he had a heart attack, but he was actually stronger than me. (At the time, I had not fully recovered from the injuries caused by the robbery.) The security of the square came to mediate, and I did not accept it. Because we can't let an old rogue do the trick! I choose to call the police. After the police came, they asked me about my situation first. The villain complained first, and he interrupted after I said a word. The police said don’t say anything, and called him aside. In the end, this old man docilely apologized to me. The behavior of the old man is obviously immoral. Once he is bound once, he will jump over the wall and stick gold on his face, such as heart disease, old age, and calling people around the square to explain things. But these are nothing compared to the objective existence of surveillance. However, if it is said that the old man's immorality is a manifestation of the animal nature, then I don't care that the old man's immorality is also a manifestation of the bestiality: in a group of animals, there are those who do not obey the group rules, and some who maintain the group rules. . Otherwise, I will swallow my voice like the described lamb and choose to ignore it.
It can be said that this film surpasses the usual excavation of murderers. The murderer's mental state has been described in detail with pictures and texts, so I gave it 8.5 points.
View more about The House That Jack Built reviews
