First of all, after reading the original book "Gulliver's Travels", the book itself uses clear words to bring me into a strange mood and describes a turbid society in humorous and ironic language. It has to be said that the original is known as one of the most influential foreign works in China without a doubt.
Going back to the film itself, it may have been adapted or performed by the actors, giving people a feeling that it is quite different from the original work. Although it is adapted from a novel, it is more likely to start anew with the help of the novel characters in the original work. Using this to express what the director or the film itself wants to express is also more in line with the tastes of young and child audiences.
If you look at it as an ordinary movie, "Gulliver's Travels" is in line with the standard of a movie; but for some original parties, there may be quite a few differences with the original they have watched, such as the original idea. The satirical effect to be achieved In my opinion, the film is not well restored; the full character film created by the original book is not well recreated (but maybe the time limit of the film does not allow everything to be 151) ten descriptions). There are some spoof scenes in the film that are somewhat objectionable.
The film's peculiar sense of British comedy is commendable. The ending is even more heartwarming than the original.
View more about Gulliver's Travels reviews
