Compared with Liang Wendao's book review, it seems to be a little worse.

Jean 2022-03-25 09:01:11

After watching it for a while, I feel that this movie is worth writing about, and it is uncomfortable not to write about it.

Liang Wendao recommended this book in a program, saying that the story of the book itself is not the most important thing, he is just a bamboo stick, and the bits and pieces in the Soviet society are the complete worldview that the original book wants to express . It turned out that Gao Xiaosong interviewed Prince Ma and said that it is difficult for people to really immerse themselves in writing historical novels without a large number of specific objects and details.

Well, back to Liang Wendao, I don't think I'm satisfied with what I say. You can watch that show, it's eight minutes from the book, and you can find it with a single search.

Let’s briefly describe it, lol. This is what interests me the most, and I don’t think the film expresses enough. In a society of repression like the Soviet Union, once you become the suspect of the party-state, they will no longer trust you. Now, the development of things can only continue to develop in the direction of finding evidence that you are a traitor to the country. If you can't find evidence, keep looking for it. If you find it, good, see you in hell.

Most people can only choose to pretend to be a model citizen, a model family, both male and female protagonists, all hoping to make themselves look "normal". Once you are a little bit unethical, I'm sorry, then we will look for your evidence, and if we can't find it, we will continue to torture you, just like the veterinarian who did nothing, just because foreigners are good to dogs, see dogs and treat dogs. The foreigners walked in a little, I'm sorry, I suspect you, search you, torture you, if you can't find it, then keep torturing you, you run away, run away, there must be ghosts, running is treason, this traitor.

When I heard him talk about the book at the time, I had a feeling, isn't this pushing the person in the middle to the enemy? I think, yes, they don't need that group of people in the middle, their world is either white or black, you're not the role model, sorry, you're a traitor, no, I made you a traitor too.

In the end, the male protagonist went back by luck, feng shui took turns, came to my house this year, and then turned to criminal cases, yes, political roulette, I can't play it anymore.

Let’s talk a little bit about the relationship between male and female protagonists. One side gets the other who doesn’t love him. This kind of relationship is actually what I hate the most. This kind of relationship is actually the most unfavorable for the woman’s growth. I have compromised in the environment, and I can only say that this may be the most favorable way for her to weigh it. This way, it is the best. I was also thinking, if she left the male protagonist at the train station, what negative impact would it have on her? I have no idea. It is also possible, I guess, in a country where people are generally unfortunate and troubled, getting an answer sheet that strives for stability is more important than chasing happiness and freedom. Just like the young daughter-in-law of the cadres who went south, the tragedy of the times.

The most interesting thing is to hear that there is a young daughter-in-law who finally studied psychology, and she is still nagging when she is old. I heard that she is not happy, which shows how lethal this kind of problem is. (Suddenly I feel a little disrespectful to a victim)

Of course, what is even more puzzling is that many people miss and learn this kind of relationship between the sexes from the older generation or TV dramas. It seems that our country is still in trouble both at home and abroad. Or is it a group of people who can't get out of the identity of the victims of that era?

.

Suddenly thinking of the last little girl, I think it is not very good to live in the enemy's house and face the little girl's mental health (the male protagonist just prefers not to kill the child, and did not say not to kill the child's parents), it is better to have another It is better to find a family to raise. Otherwise, if you grow up under the nurturing of your enemies, is hatred more important or feelings are more important? This kind of thing will be very twisted, maybe it will haunt the child for most of his life.

View more about Child 44 reviews

Extended Reading

Child 44 quotes

  • [first lines]

    Tortoise: Your father?

    Young Leo Demidov: [yes]

    Tortoise: Dead?

    Young Leo Demidov: [yes]

    Tortoise: What's your name?

    Young Leo Demidov: I don't want it any more.

    Tortoise: I'll give you a new one. Leo. Like a lion.

  • Leo Demidov: If you are so innocent, why do you run? Hmm?

    Anatoly Tarasovich Brodsky: That's a very good question. I run because you were following me. When you are followed, you are arrested. And when you are arrested, you are already guilty. So you tell me, why did I run?

Related Articles