In fact, everyone has said the main plot, but the controversy everyone has about this film is actually whether it is legal to kill the enemy directly.
In fact, this has been a topic of debate in the legal profession for many years, procedural justice (must have legally obtained evidence) and consequential justice (only if it is determined that he is guilty), in fact, there are two risks under both justices. Abuse, the result is a greater risk of justice, and the second is the difficulty of obtaining evidence, which is a greater risk to procedural justice. But why not Europe and the United States are still more willing to adopt procedural justice? I personally think that it is not that procedural justice is more fair and reasonable, but that it is easier for the powerful to evade legal sanctions under the rules of procedural justice.
As for the justice of the public and the rational of the mother, there will be any kind of justice, although there are relatively more procedural justice. European and American laws often like to say who gave you the right to kill (revenge)? Then I can ask back, who gave the right to legal judgment? In fact, everyone has given it. It’s just that now everyone does not recognize the legality of revenge, but in fact, what is the difference between self-defense and revenge? Personally, I think the focus is on timing.
Of course, personal opinions, accept reasonable discussions, and stop the trolls.
View more about Death Wish reviews
