I didn't know until I saw the end that the story was actually going on at the same time 10 years ago and now. Maybe the director/screenwriter wanted to give people a feeling of "Oh, the original jigsaw game was 10 years ago", but if not Considering the fact that Jigsaw is dead, the setting of "the game is 10 years ago" seems to have no other foreshadowing. It is not an amazing feeling to see at the end, but it feels that something is missing, and the ending is a bit abrupt.
Maybe I didn't read it very seriously. The female doctor (should be the first female doctor) didn't explain it very clearly at the end. There were a lot of stories and clues about her (such as introducing new game equipment), but she didn't explain her in the end. I feel like her presence doesn't seem to be of any use. .
In addition, the appearance of the classic line "You are not a jigsaw, the jigsaw will give people the option to win" is not as thoughtful as the previous work. This arrangement seems to be telling the audience that there is still Chainsaw 9, or just taking the stem. ? The character change is okay, the fat man's last sentence "We could all be free", because there is "begging to kill the children to take him with him after the broken leg" as a foreshadowing, I don't particularly feel that the reversal is very big, killing the children He also showed cruelty after the truth of the murder was exposed, ignoring life only for his own side.
Maybe it's my prejudice. I used to watch Chainsaw, and I just wanted to watch something bloody, but there will always be some unexpected gains, whether it's some classic lines, or some characters from the previous work reappear in an unexpected way, or It's a deeper excavation of the whole story setting, but this one didn't give me some small surprises. Overall, it's a sequel, not a particularly good sequel, not a bad sequel, and Chainsaw 8 is a sequel. . .
View more about Jigsaw reviews
