First sigh one or two.
Philip Seymour Hoffman is so handsome! Rarely would I find an old man with white hair, a pot belly, and a cigarette to be handsome, but it was Philip. With his unique charisma, persistent pursuit of his career, and maintenance of his inner justice, I felt that this man was a man. Exudes a dazzling male charm. It seems that men can be attractive without relying on looks, body, or money.
Rachel McAdams (Rachel McAdams), played the role of the time traveler lover in two consecutive films, I was very impressed with Rachel. And under her deviant character, she has a kind and compassionate heart, gentle yet strong, no one can resist such a woman. There are many scenes of Rachel riding away on a bicycle in the film, which is frank and sexy. If I were a man, I would definitely fall in love with her.
The entire film is nearly two hours long. From start to finish, it revolves around a suspect with a special identity. Philip closely monitored him and used his superb intelligence agencies to find out the identity of this person and the people he was in contact with. During the period, he and his colleagues had differences, one wanted to arrest and the other wanted to protect, and Robin Wright, who was parachuted from the United States (in other words, she was too suitable to play this kind of female politician), seemed to have been defending him, helping him, and in the Morally stand with him.
Spy movies are generally very brain-burning, and this film has a lower degree of brain-burning. In addition to the above three people, this half-Chechen, half-Russian young man born in sin has invited the manager of the family property and a sexy lawyer who sympathizes with him. The four groups of people finally reach an unanimous goal to lure out a true terrorist supporter using the inheritance of the young people as bait. This trapping process is exceptionally smooth and is not the focus of the film itself. The highlight of the film is the unexpected turn of the plot after the successful trapping. The U.S. officials who declared freedom and peace in their mouths revealed their true intentions at the last minute: all those who are related to terrorist activities will be captured and destroyed by terrorist actions, and they will be punished in their own way! The ending is like a slap in the face of freedom, equality, and human rights. The so-called freedom is only one-sided freedom; the so-called equality is only the equality of the right people; the so-called human rights are only the human rights of some people. Nearly two hours of straightforward narrative, just to tell the audience this ending. The seemingly bland plot contains the director's pungent satire. Fight violence with violence, fight terror with terror. When we mourn for this young man who came from a tragic background and whose fate is being tested, we can only be helpless and powerless like Rachel and Philip. . . . . .
There is no absolute right or wrong in the world. From their point of view, they are both right. The ordinary and insignificance of human beings precisely reflects the limitations of this human manipulation. Small film, big world.
There are two more moving parts in the film, one is the conversation between Philip and the informant; the other is the sudden hug of the informant when he knew that he had sent his father to the point of no return. The laws of the world can't match the warmth of human feelings.
View more about A Most Wanted Man reviews
