Let's talk about casting first. From beginning to end, the heroine looks like someone else owes her millions. Whether it's Rochester complimenting her, flirting with her, or talking to her, she still looks like she can't pull it off. So that the hostess left halfway through the banquet. Rochester said that she looked a little depressed, and I couldn't see any change in her expression? ? ? This guy plays Jane as a bitter-faced woman, who does look like a boring and annoying governess.
French Shark is very, very unsuitable for Rochester. I could see he was trying to play a cold, bitter Rochester, but like the heroine, with a rigid expression, I couldn't see how he could fall in love with the heroine. Moreover, how can there be such a young Rochester! He still looks like a playful young man, and he doesn't have the maturity and madness of Rochester at all. These two points are the biggest characteristics of the character in the original novel, but Fa Shark did not perform at all.
How did these two sparks come together? ? I can't see it either. The two seemed to read the lines mechanically, with no acting skills at all. I was jumping and watching the whole time, and I really couldn't hold on to it every minute and every second. The only thing that "resonates" with this movie is that I have the same expression as the heroine throughout the whole process, "I can't pull shi".....
Say that word again. To sum it up in one word, pale and feeble. Forgive me for not being literate enough to appreciate such profound lines, I don't know, it may be the actor's performance, thanks for this movie, I will never forget that when the hero proposed to the heroine, the heroine spoke for a long time The embarrassment caused by the "unintelligible" rejection. . .
The reason this movie seems tedious and tedious is that, in addition to its most fatal characterization failure, there is rhythm control, failure. Some people may say that the ingeniousness of this film lies in the arrangement of flashbacks on the timeline, which is indeed a novelty that other versions of Jane Eyre do not have. But you can't go without orgasms, or have some small orgasms. Obviously it is such an ups and downs love story, and it is hard to cook into a bowl of tasteless white porridge. IMHO, it is really hard to swallow. In the last scene, even under the background of soft light and green grass, I could not feel the excitement of the hero and heroine having experienced so many last encounters. real! one! point! fire! flower! nothing!
I don't know what the two actors are thinking, anyway, I don't think they enjoy making this movie too much. So, how important is the choice of a role to an actor! ok, if the role is not chosen, at least use acting to support it? no. It doesn't matter how expressive the actors are. The director's technique is also very monotonous. The scene when the male and female protagonists met for the first time was inexplicable to me. The horse appeared suddenly like a juggler. It wasn't a romantic encounter, but at least a thrill. The encounter is good? Now it's totally frightening....
Almost every version of "Pride and Prejudice" has its own brilliance, so the same book can actually be adapted into a script with its own characteristics and a movie with a personality. But unfortunately, "Jane Eyre" is not only rarely remade, but the 2006 version is my favorite at present. Although this movie version had the title of BBC Film in front of it, I still had a little expectation, but it was beaten badly. Alas, feel angry, don't say it.
View more about Jane Eyre reviews
