The whole plot gives the impression:
It's a bit absurd + ironic, but think about it, you can really see other content.
What you do at ordinary times still affects your skills more or less. If he hadn't been a security guard in the museum for a long time and had access to relevant information, Bean wouldn't have used egg whites and other things to manipulate the civet cat when he changed the prince.
There are also curators who actually chose to hide the painting after seeing that the painting was destroyed, instead of finding a way to solve it. This is a bit like what we usually do when we encounter difficult problems. Don't die too miserably the next day. Although the play presents a "miraculous" ending, the reality is often crueler. In the play, Bean itself presents a very unreliable person. If the curator can directly close the painting and let Bean stay elsewhere, presumably the following plot will not happen. So what is the hint for us? Many problems arise because we don’t pay enough attention, or because our assessment of people (including ourselves) is skewed.
As for Bean, he perfectly presents us with a wonderful daily life. Fortunately, he is very kind, and there are people around him who can read his kindness. In reality, how can there be so many people who experience the beauty within you through your extremely different performances?
View more about Bean reviews
