The film's performance is novel and the story is gripping. It was originally a good suspense film. It is a pity that the revealing of the real murderer at the end is too hasty, and the female police officer's behavior of covering up her son's crime cannot stand scrutiny. A major logical hole that makes the whole story far-fetched and the characters fragmented, really disappointing.
The male protagonist saw the picture of the model in the funeral home and thought of the avatar of fish and chips. After a search on the Internet, he found that he was a commercial model. It was obvious that the picture was stolen, but he actually thought that the model had kidnapped his child. not online. It was precisely because he thought that he had new clues to call the female police officer and the female police officer did not answer the phone, that he learned from other people that the female police officer had actively participated in the investigation and had other plans.
After this, the entire reasoning chain began to loosen and collapse. First of all, the female police officers were all successfully framed, and they didn't run away to go to the funeral, why should they hide and not answer the phone? Wouldn't it be better if I came out to comfort my father by inviting him to the funeral to clear his doubts? Secondly, the female police officer already knew that the father persevered and felt that the whole case was still suspicious. telephone?
At this point, my father began to suspect the police officer, so he carefully looked at the photos and found that the prisoner who confessed to suicide before was a prisoner the police officer knew. According to the gossipy social network design in the movie, there were hundreds of exclusive articles on declassification and case analysis just after the girl's disappearance was disclosed. Why has no one googled the scapegoat's photo for so long? Even if the gossip people aren't interested in scapegoating, wouldn't Dad have googled the answer earlier? It's so easy to google the content of a female police officer and a case investigator so careless, don't know how to manipulate and demand that relevant news reports be deleted? Can't I delete a scapegoat who can't find information related to her online?
Later, the female police officer was arrested and began to state the crime, which turned out to be to cover up her son's mistakes. But I still didn't understand what my son's mistake was: pretending to be a woman to chase the live broadcast of the girl he had a crush on? The girl he had a crush on believed in his bitter love scene and offered him $2,500? Feeling too guilty and sorry that the person who has a crush wants to give her the money back and admit that he lied to her? When I got to the edge of the cliff, the girl took the medicine so high that she thought he was a perverted murderer and started kicking and hitting him.
At this time, the son called his mother to ask her for help. Even if the girl fell to her death in such an obvious accident, the chain of evidence for the cause and effect is sufficient, and the facts are clear. The law in the United States is that there is never a suspected crime. In addition to losing money in an accident, it is impossible to go to jail. The first reaction of this mother who works in the judicial system is not to rush to the police to save people and fight for an accident with a good attitude, but to tell her son to run away. , took over the case and found a scapegoat, and in order to find this scapegoat, he deliberately killed someone? This is like escaping from a crash. If you run away, you are intentional homicide, and even if you don’t die, you will be sentenced to 100%; if you don’t run, you will crash and die, as long as it proves to be an accident, at most civil compensation! In addition, in this case, the girl was also at fault when she climbed a cliff after sipping on marijuana. The boy just said that I saw the girl driving, drawing a dragon, walking and shaking like she had drank the medicine, so I was afraid that she would be unsafe, so I followed and had a look, and there was no problem at all! This senior and outstanding female police officer does not understand this truth, and would rather kill in order not to lose money? Killed twice?
Intentional and negligence are important concepts of the perpetrator's subjective meaning in criminal law, and obviously the director of this film has no knowledge of this. He distorted the characters in order to create a suspenseful story, and forced the story to make the girl survive. The originally good suspense plot is really good. of collapse.
View more about Searching reviews
