I doubt the authenticity of the last sentence my mother said. I think this is a suspense that the movie deliberately left everyone.
A mother who dotes on her son so much that she even committed a crime for him and killed the drug addict to cover up the truth. When faced with interrogation, will she truthfully and completely explain the truth of her son's crime? I don't believe it, there must be some degree of beautification. By making appropriate adaptations and optimizations based on the facts, the son's crimes are mitigated.
This take full responsibility is worth remembering.
The first doubt, when Margot started, he told his father that he would not come home at night. From this we can see that Margot has a clear destination for this night, and she knows that it will be very late and may not be able to go home. And smoking marijuana at her uncle's house doesn't need to take up the entire time, so that means she should have other arrangements after smoking marijuana. And the episodic movie doesn't say where she's going.
However, there is a related piece of evidence that the police officer said the son was stalking. If it's really tracking, it's hard to explain why margot went to the lake late at night? The reason is most likely that Robert (the police officer's son) made an appointment with Margot.
The officer said that Margot was smoking in the car. According to the uncle, they usually use drugs and chat at home. Even if he simply went to the lake to take drugs that night, he would definitely not stay home all night, because this is a routine event, and Margot would not suddenly say that he would stay up all night and cause his father's suspicion.
So someone must have asked her out. Moreover, the police officer said that Margot was taking drugs, but his father did not tell her the whole process. So it should be the mother that Robert himself knew about Margot's drug use and told it.
The second suspect is the $2,500 envelope on the car. If the son really wants to repay the money and wants to tell Margot the truth, he can transfer money directly online, why should he exchange cash in person? Admitting mistakes in person should be harder than it should be online.
Robert said on youcast that he needed to borrow money because he had to pay for his mother's hospitalization. This is also very questionable. Was Robert trying to concoct sympathy by making up the same fate, or was he really trying to get money? I prefer the latter. If you simply want to use the same background to increase the common topic, you don't have to reveal that you have no money. Instead, I should talk more about my mother's feelings about being sick. So I think Robert is genuinely in need of money.
Combined with the story that the police officer told about his son raising money before: borrowing 25 yuan from each neighbor. Obviously the son has a criminal record of cheating money. Therefore, I feel that the cash in the envelope in the car is a foreshadowing that the mother is going to sell for her son.
The third doubt, what is the purpose of the son's loan all the time? I'm guessing it might be related to drug use.
Why would a police officer build a detox center with an ex-convict? This should be what you need to do to get rid of drugs, right?
In addition, the uncle on the left of the police officer in the picture, the person who later admitted that he killed Margot, was arrested for drug use and sexual assault. He was finally willing to admit that he killed Margot himself, should he have made some kind of py deal with the police officer? PS: The police officer is also single
Is this kind of py transaction the first time? Or did you have a py trade when you built a drug rehab center in the past to protect your son? Let your son detoxify under his own eyes
The fourth point, when Dad first appeared on his daughter's Facebook, in the information stream, Robert posted a message 12 hours ago. Apparently he has no repentance.
Point 5: The website for that mourning service. After the father submits his personal information, the submission success page is given. This waiter! It looks creepy, why is she again, who made this website? ?
From the picture I think it's Robert. Because if it is a formal website, it will definitely invite a model. And it happens that the probability of this girl is too low! In terms of personal habits, after you use the image of this girl, there is a high probability that you will use it again next time!
So I think Robert built this station to scam margot's photos and videos. In the end, he also got the data. And we can see the live and final mourning service live video page, the data submitted on this site is not used anywhere at all! !
Final verdict: Robert was an overly spoiled child with a habit of taking drugs, and on the day of the crime he made an appointment with Margot to sexually assault her. Struggling, Margot fell off a cliff. Or being pushed off a cliff. . .
View more about Searching reviews
