Note: It's a bit of "The Man with the Camera" (although the two purposes are very different); at the beginning, the plan séquence with the camera, the jump cut of the interviewee, and the voice-over (question by the staff) all have a kind of The feeling of "pseudo-documentary"; cinéma dans le cinéma; the style of filming in the film is completely different, the characters are basically facing the camera, especially when Mochizuki recalls the clip, he looks at the "camera", the next shot is usually not What appears in the finished film, but is an integral part of the film's creation, the camera crew, when they are also presented: front, looking towards the camera (the audience). Now they are also part of the film. This kind of lens language with film d'attraction gives people a completely different feeling, compared to the "documentary" shooting method mentioned above; ps: This kind of feeling is like staying in the film world after watching the film in the theater , isn't it a real movie viewing experience? And the whole film is the whole process of making a film to the final presentation, so it can be said to be "a film about a film"?
View more about After Life reviews
