After reading the book of the Naples tetralogy, I have no interest in watching TV dramas at all. In addition to being too tiring to read, another point is that the reason for the two heroines to bond with each other is too unclear, or too confusing. The author has been using events to tell us about the relationship between the two of them. There are few concluding remarks. The reason for the two of them is entirely up to the readers to guess. After reading the first part, I think that the two of them should be jealous of each other so they sympathize with each other. But after reading the second part, I felt that the two of them were completely in love. But love also has a reason for love. Anyway, it seems inexplicable to me. There are so many girls in town just because they both study well? Mainly because the author did not summarize, I am not sure if it is what I thought. The third part is completely chaotic. I feel that the two of them have five, six, seven or eight clones. What they can do depends on the author's mood. The fourth part has given up the search, and began to dislike the author's humiliation of Elena, who was modeled on herself, and the immaculate imagination of the other party, Lila. In short, I just feel that what an author writes can't get rid of himself at all, more or less. The era of this novel is very in line with the author's own upbringing, which inevitably makes people suspect that this is the author's semi-autobiographical novel. So I guessed that the reason why the author failed to summarize their relationship well, maybe she didn't know very well why the other party liked her at that time. Of course, I'm just guessing, people might just be proficient in this writing technique. So I may really only be suitable for reading romance novels. When an ordinary overbearing president falls in love with a commoner girl, wouldn't he always give a hint, what "Her clear eyes let him see the happiness he has never seen in his life." "Under her ordinary appearance, there is such a large amount of energy, and her passionate playing instantly conquered everyone present, and his face rose slightly" or something. Love is incompetent as I am. Only when the author named the characters she likes and why I like them can I truly believe why they like them. It just felt weird. Of course, the Naples tetralogy may just borrow the fetters of the two people and involve a person's growth history. As for why the two girls are fettered, it may not be the focus of the author's expression.
—————————————————————
Recently, I found the source of my idea. In a program, the column team invited the translation of this book. The translation sister said that in fact, the relationship between the two heroines is the true love.
When she finished saying this, I instantly understood the reason why I was confused.
My confusion is not without reason. Yes, there is probably no emotion that can explain such a long and profound bond between the two heroines, except for love. But in my nature, I don't want to attribute their feelings to love, because then it's easy to slip into the stereotype of homosexuality, but now I understand a little bit, the love between human beings, if it is sublimated a little, is still very noble, isn't it? ?
——2021.11.02
View more about My Brilliant Friend reviews
