(Not released in China) If you know more or less the intricate relationship chain in the Middle East, then I believe this will be an unprecedented and wonderful movie. If you know nothing about Middle Eastern history like me, then this movie is enough to make you cry. At first, it was a personal war between populism and patriotism, with the defendant and the plaintiff clearly divided. The cause of the story is so simple and outrageous. As a Palestinian refugee, Yasser was commissioned by the Israelis to build a refugee area for his compatriots and renovate illegal buildings. During the office inspection, he was unfortunately drenched by Tony's illegal drainage pipe. He did not blame him. He also installed and repaired it for him for free, but Tony smashed it, and at this time, the unbearable Yasser slandered Tony. Tony felt humiliated and asked Yasser to apologize to him. Under the hard bubble, Yasser agreed to visit Tony to apologize to him, but after Tony said, "I hope Ariel Sharon gets rid of all Palestinians", Yasser broke two of his ribs, and then caused a fire. A series of events were intertwined, and finally the two decided to confront each other in court. Then, at the instigation of lawyers whose father and daughter had different political views, Tony and Yasser became the detonation devices for the conflict between Lebanese Christians and Palestinian refugees, and they later consciously represented the people rioting outside the courtroom. The refugee issue was brought to the forefront, and even the president had to privately ask them to settle in court. As the case deepens, Tony's unknown past is also revealed to the public. As a survivor of the Holocaust, all his stubborn and ignorant behavior is no longer a symbol of populism, but a simple and simple revenge. I also It's hard to define who the real shame is. He and his father escaped from the clutches of the Palestine Liberation Army, but the knot in their hearts could not be solved. And the conscientious Yasir, although an impulsive and reckless person, is a good person through and through. He was only confused by the insulting words of the nation, and should not be sentenced to a felony (the crime that caused a series of events was also imposed on the on him). The two are both victims and perpetrators, and as Tony's unwilling to look back past is revealed, their relationship in court begins to cool down. I talked about the importance of dignity before, but Yasser's arrogance as a literati has become the fuse of all causes. You can say that he is restricted to small details and ignores the overall situation. vexatious behavior and demands, such a strong dignity is necessary. Yasser is innocent. He doesn't know Tony's past, let alone his feelings towards his own nation. hatred, so that the weight of the word "idiot" is infinitely magnified. But looking back at Tony, we can find his pitifulness and the rationality of all his actions. On the surface, it seems to be populism, but it can be deeply rooted. Isn't this what Hegel said "existence is rationality"? He just used a small act of humiliation as a pretext for his small punishment against the Palestinians, even if he picked the wrong person. We do not have the right to say that he is a generalist, and we have no reason to do so because he has more. His behavior is rational and full of humanity. The theme of this film is not just "poor people must be sad," but it makes us start to fear criticism or even slander of others. Others, for us, everyone is a brand new concept, I don't know his past, let alone how to compare our situation is better or worse, every word we say no longer stop at superficial meaning, Maybe our praise is a kind of teasing in the eyes of others, our comments are overly distorted and touch the sensitive nerves of others, self-righteous guidance is humiliation and ridicule in the eyes of others, and these words hurt It is by no means inferior to physical whipping, on the contrary it is lasting and irreversible. In times of peace, we may not feel much, but in the Middle East, every word may be the root cause of war. Once again, we return to the old-fashioned topic of responsibility. We are born as prehumans. How much do we have to bear is the right answer? I have to say no, it's the same as how high or low you set the bottom line or a movable parallel line. Every action we do is shaping the image of human beings. Until we truly become human and end the transcendence of human beings, we can't draw conclusions, which means that before I was still prehuman, we were alone and had no standards. It is true that dignity (revenge is also included in dignity, which I will not argue here) is the root cause of people's conflict, but dignity is by no means the opposite of responsibility, even if dignity prevents us from giving in and responsibility makes us accept more. On the journey of becoming a human being, I think the friction of contradictions is necessary, which teaches us how to let go of the past in the war of dignity. As for how the movie will go in the end, don't you know if you go to see it? Ren Xiaoxiao's pretext for punishment, even if he finds the wrong person. We do not have the right to say that he is a generalist, and we have no reason to do so because he has more. His behavior is rational and full of humanity. The theme of this film is not just "poor people must be sad," but it makes us start to fear criticism or even slander of others. Others, for us, everyone is a brand new concept, I don't know his past, let alone how to compare our situation is better or worse, every word we say no longer stop at superficial meaning, Maybe our praise is a kind of teasing in the eyes of others, our comments are overly distorted and touch the sensitive nerves of others, self-righteous guidance is humiliation and ridicule in the eyes of others, and these words hurt It is by no means inferior to physical whipping, on the contrary it is lasting and irreversible. In times of peace, we may not feel much, but in the Middle East, every word may be the root cause of war. Once again, we return to the old-fashioned topic of responsibility. We are born as prehumans. How much do we have to bear is the right answer? I have to say no, it's the same as how high or low you set the bottom line or a movable parallel line. Every action we do is shaping the image of human beings. Until we truly become human and end the transcendence of human beings, we can't draw conclusions, which means that before I was still prehuman, we were alone and had no standards. It is true that dignity (revenge is also included in dignity, which I will not argue here) is the root cause of people's conflict, but dignity is by no means the opposite of responsibility, even if dignity prevents us from giving in and responsibility makes us accept more. On the journey of becoming a human being, I think the friction of contradictions is necessary, which teaches us how to let go of the past in the war of dignity. As for how the movie will go in the end, don't you know if you go to see it? Ren Xiaoxiao's pretext for punishment, even if he finds the wrong person. We do not have the right to say that he is a generalist, and we have no reason to do so because he has more. His behavior is rational and full of humanity. The theme of this film is not just "poor people must be sad," but it makes us start to fear criticism or even slander of others. Others, for us, everyone is a brand new concept, I don't know his past, let alone how to compare our situation is better or worse, every word we say no longer stop at superficial meaning, Maybe our praise is a kind of teasing in the eyes of others, our comments are overly distorted and touch the sensitive nerves of others, self-righteous guidance is humiliation and ridicule in the eyes of others, and these words hurt It is by no means inferior to physical whipping, on the contrary it is lasting and irreversible. In times of peace, we may not feel much, but in the Middle East, every word may be the root cause of war. Once again, we return to the old-fashioned topic of responsibility. We are born as prehumans. How much do we have to bear is the right answer? I have to say no, it's the same as how high or low you set the bottom line or a movable parallel line. Every action we do is shaping the image of human beings. Until we truly become human and end the transcendence of human beings, we can't draw conclusions, which means that before I was still prehuman, we were alone and had no standards. It is true that dignity (revenge is also included in dignity, which I will not argue here) is the root cause of people's conflict, but dignity is by no means the opposite of responsibility, even if dignity prevents us from giving in and responsibility makes us accept more. On the journey of becoming a human being, I think the friction of contradictions is necessary, which teaches us how to let go of the past in the war of dignity. As for how the movie will go in the end, don't you know if you go to see it? In the eyes of others, it is humiliation and ridicule, and these verbal injuries are by no means inferior to physical flogging, on the contrary, it is lasting and irreversible. In times of peace, we may not feel much, but in the Middle East, every word may be the root cause of war. Once again, we return to the old-fashioned topic of responsibility. We are born as prehumans. How much do we have to bear is the right answer? I have to say no, it's the same as how high or low you set the bottom line or a movable parallel line. Every action we do is shaping the image of human beings. Until we truly become human and end the transcendence of human beings, we can't draw conclusions, which means that before I was still prehuman, we were alone and had no standards. It is true that dignity (revenge is also included in dignity, which I will not argue here) is the root cause of people's conflict, but dignity is by no means the opposite of responsibility, even if dignity prevents us from giving in and responsibility makes us accept more. On the journey of becoming a human being, I think the friction of contradictions is necessary, which teaches us how to let go of the past in the war of dignity. As for how the movie will go in the end, don't you know if you go to see it? In the eyes of others, it is humiliation and ridicule, and these verbal injuries are by no means inferior to physical flogging, on the contrary, it is lasting and irreversible. In times of peace, we may not feel much, but in the Middle East, every word may be the root cause of war. Once again, we return to the old-fashioned topic of responsibility. We are born as prehumans. How much do we have to bear is the right answer? I have to say no, it's the same as how high or low you set the bottom line or a movable parallel line. Every action we do is shaping the image of human beings. Until we truly become human and end the transcendence of human beings, we can't draw conclusions, which means that before I was still prehuman, we were alone and had no standards. It is true that dignity (revenge is also included in dignity, which I will not argue here) is the root cause of people's conflict, but dignity is by no means the opposite of responsibility, even if dignity prevents us from giving in and responsibility makes us accept more. On the journey of becoming a human being, I think the friction of contradictions is necessary, which teaches us how to let go of the past in the war of dignity. As for how the movie will go in the end, don't you know if you go to see it?
View more about The Insult reviews
