I watched it at Nortel at the premiere. I have to say, this is the most boring movie of all Aamir Khan's movies I've seen... Although I like Aamir Khan's other movies, this one is really not up to the level of my friends. degree of viewing.
Let’s start with the pros: the beginning is great! I like it very much! The atmosphere marketing was great, the sculptures were washed out by the rain, Azads, were particularly flaming and powerful, and the action scenes on board were great. The shape of the female archer and the design of the archer are very eye-catching. The selection of actors is very suitable for the characters, and there is nothing wrong with them.
Disadvantages: The reason why I think it is not good-looking and boring, the core is that the story is too boring. I lost my patience from the moment I entered the palace to dance... I feel that the part where the male first entered the palace was a little unreasonable. The action scenes are good, but the whole film is so long, and every time you win, you rely on force, and it is very, very boring to see the middle part. Although the story also has some beginnings and turns, but nothing new or strange, whether it is the way the story turns, or the characters (Aamir Khan is too similar from the shape to the character and Captain Sparrow, so why don't the audience directly What about Pirates of the Caribbean?).
In short, I deeply feel that the quality of the movie is not necessarily proportional to the production cost and special effects. Even a creator at the level of Aamir Khan must return to the story itself. Otherwise, the market will definitely teach a hard lesson. The audience will not care about the difficulty of your creation, how much investment you have made, and so on. Whether it is in India or China, the box office is much lower than expected, which indeed shows a lot of problems.
View more about Thugs of Hindostan reviews
