Why do movies fail? I think it's just too much faith in "reversal". The plot of the movie does need to be reversed, but it must not be reversed for the sake of reversal, let alone that the movie is a reversal.
Perhaps, the screenwriters are beginning to translate their plot structure very well. The protagonist is a mercenary villain who can live comfortably and proudly when the country has become a colony and he has become a second-class citizen. However, he still changed, because he saw hope in the anti-British hero. This not only conforms to the reality of human nature, but also shows the development of the characters, which is not bad! The second reversal should be admitted to be a bit ingenious, because the protagonist sees the anti-British hero being arrested. If the original plan is followed, then the jade and stone may be destroyed, so he sells the resistance team first, and then rescues the resistance team in the middle of the night. Chief killed.
The problem is, in order to create a reversal, a lot of the plot is misrepresented. For example, it is not wrong to fight against the hidden island of the team and use the natural barrier to defeat the British army, but since it is a hidden island, it is unreasonable to put the leader of the British army back. To put it back, there must be enough defense against the British army, but it was successfully raided by the British army. Similarly, the protagonist brought a resistance team and wiped out a British fleet, and later said that it was to complete the mission (coax all the resistance teams to the door)? Is the leader of the British army really a fool? If only I would show my head on the spot and take the opportunity to intimidate the rest of the resistance forces.
So, the problem with the movie is that it only captures the reversal, but ignores the more fundamental issue of the rationality of the plot. 19.1.19
olowXT�\kAUM
View more about Thugs of Hindostan reviews
