What I want to say about the movie "Starting Line" is: 1. The protagonist's performance is too emotional, not like a businessman who has experienced market games and constantly pursues a win-win situation for both sides of the transaction. The protagonist is a shrewd and capable figure who can actively respond to problems and needs, including promoting fashion, throwing parties to build high-class social networks, sending money through the back door, and finally spending money to buy poor status. The wisdom of these win-win transactions will not be withdrawn after reaching the poor community. The money is used to exchange the assigned places among the poor for home, and then the money is invested in the local public schools to greatly improve the educational environment of local children and benefit more poor families. This poor family who trades a lot can also be considered worth it, including the outspoken Shyam Prakash in the film who has been poor for generations and wants his children to stand out (that is, the loyalty that would not hesitate to jump out of the road and get hit by a car in exchange for money that a friend desperately needs) Neighbors) will also consider how slim the chance of getting into a top-ranked school is and accept the sudden opportunity. Most of the poor people are very good at calculating real interests. The poor people depicted in the film are too straight and rigid. There are many ways to negotiate and broker this deal, it is left to the reader's imagination.
2. The movie is not a movie about children's education, but an expressive theme movie that criticizes the social status quo of the serious uneven distribution of educational resources caused by the severe solidification of the Indian class, without any positive measures or thinking. There is no act of communicating and educating children in the film. Only adults have the final say. Children follow their buttocks, let them receive advanced training at one time, live a poor life at one time, keep up with upper-class schools at one time, and enter public schools at the ground floor at one time. Will be hurt, this is what we have to be vigilant about. At the end of the movie, the protagonist just made a method based on the trend of emotions to show that even poor children can have excellent performances, revealing the reality that the upper class solidified and monopolized educational resources but blackened their hearts, and announced that they would leave with contempt. Of course justice is awe-inspiring, but without any positive measures and thinking. None of the public was aroused, and the principal was still able to say a few words casually. However, my family chose to go back. The previous efforts were wasted and a lot of time and energy were wasted. It is undoubtedly a huge loss to the family.
Third, to sum up,
- Even in the face of solidified social injustice, positive life attitudes and positive behavior changes are meaningful and necessary, but the results must play a practical role in change. Even if you optimize your family's choices, instead of expressing your emotions and turning back.
- On the way of children's education, we must always put the children's spiritual construction in the first place. Only children who have spiritual support, a sense of existence, and a sense of identity will be cultivated into students with a positive life. This cannot be without a relatively stable environment that they like.
Nickiss aspirants concerned with personal growth and child development
2018-05-01
View more about Hindi Medium reviews
