Explanation: I haven't read the novel, I'm just talking about my feelings about this drama.
Just a few questions
1. On what basis did the murderers determine their guilt?
[It is reasonable that the murderer can obtain everyone's information through various channels such as the dossier, but how to determine their crimes? If it is only based on life experience and experience or intuition to make a conclusion, then the target selection method of the murderer and the whole drama's benchmark for murder and conviction (killing the guilty person) are biased, then the murderer is just standing in justice and morality. It is a very common personal behavior, that is, simple murder. Then the opening broadcast in the play, announcing the plot of everyone's crime, seems very meaningless and redundant. 】
2. How can a terminally ill old man kill one by one as planned?
[I just want to ask the murderer, how did you do it? ? ? According to the content of the poem, everyone has a different way of dying and the order, so how did this uncle control the audience so accurately by himself? The first two deceased can be drugged, which is reasonable. The general, the aunt, and the doctor are also reasonable. Because of their acquaintances, they will not take precautions and may be killed in an instant; but the police, Philip, and especially the women who hang them, are actually all right. It's very difficult, the main TV series did not restore the murder scene, so we don't know how he killed it. But in fact, the method of killing the sports car man is also very risky. What if he keeps holding the wine glass? What if I exchanged cups with someone else? It's all very likely to happen.
Killing one or two and doing it meticulously according to the plan, I think it is achievable, but with so many people, a terminally ill old man has to take the risk of being discovered by everyone (because everyone believes that the killer is among them, so they suspect each other and pay attention to each other's movements. ) to carry out the crime, it is really too difficult and too difficult, and any one of the variables will overturn the overall plan. In short, this matter is too difficult to convince people, too difficult to withstand scrutiny. 】
3. When the first victim dies, why can everyone go back to their room and sleep alone?
[This is really a bit exaggerated. Let me ask, if we are in it and someone dies and is judged to be murder, and it matches the death method of the first person in the poem, would you dare to go back to your room and sleep alone? ? Even if you go back to your own room, before that, because it’s the first time you met each other, you don’t know each other and don’t trust each other. You should discuss some ways to restrain each other and take precautions, such as taking shifts, such as which areas the group is responsible for, and not acting alone (such as Going to the kitchen, going to the beach, etc.) Could it be that someone was killed somehow, and everyone was so calm? 】
4. The heroine found that every time a person dies, there will be one less villain on the table. Since she found out why not to observe this as an entry point, or just throw these villains away to disturb the murderer, in short, this is a clue, It is also a breakthrough, but it is not used well.
5. In the process of killing ten people one by one, why did no one ever think about escaping the island? ? Find a way to make a boat, tear down the door, and escape as a raft! Or think of other ways. Except in the end, Philip pulled the heroine out of the house and sought a way out. No one had suggested or planned how to escape before. It was incomprehensible.
6. Why are they rendering their deaths in a hallucinatory way? The aunt and the heroine are both, this method feels so cliché, well, this question is purely a personal subjective question, and it is not necessary to make reference.
7. How could the killer control the heroine's IQ so accurately?
[Actually, if the heroine is a little bit smarter, the whole game may be turned against the wind. In the end, the heroine actually thought that Philip was the murderer. ? ! ! ! If he is really the murderer, and you two are left in the end, why doesn't he just shoot you down and give you a chance to get a gun? And when the judge died and the police died, they were both together, so why kill them? Is it insane? ? If the heroine thinks a little calmly, the ending may change completely.
And in the end, the heroine returned to the room and wanted to commit suicide. Inexplicably, there were many hanging ropes in the room. What do you think? The normal reaction should be to feel strange, where did the rope come from, and it means that the murderer is still there, otherwise the rope will run up by itself? This IQ, my God~]
8. Why do people find that everyone's death happens according to what is described in the poem, but they don't pay attention to avoiding contact with the next method of death?
[For example, about zoos and water, at least everyone reminds each other and pays attention not to do anything. This is normal. The people here feel like they are willing to be slaughtered by others, and they don’t pay any attention to the content of the poem. 】
9. Subjective question - how can you guarantee that Philip will not suddenly draw a gun and kill the rest?
[Since the murderer is between us, then I know that I am not. I will just kill the rest of you. With Philip's smart and ruthless character, it is very likely that this is the case~ Life-saving is the most important thing, and the rest Let's talk about it later, such as how to leave the island, how to justify this murder, and so on. 】
The above is my main feeling after watching this drama... The first time I wrote a film review, it was tiring...
View more about And Then There Were None reviews
