"The original show was fighting for tolerance, our fight was for acceptance".
Young Master (Huang Zhizhong) said in the debate that we are not trying to win over everyone, what we want to win are those who are vacillating in the middle.
The young master believes that the most interesting part of the debate is the point of view and the offense and defense.
Based on this, "Wonderful Flowers" has been a great success. It is entertaining and entertaining, making people feel the joy of debate, and in the entertainment atmosphere, it easily loosens people's ideas.
The original intention of the young master was to promote debate.
When you're promoting something, selling a product, or spreading an opinion:
To increase exposure: contact with different groups of people through different channels;
To reduce the difficulty: in order to win the majority of people (including the less educated), people need to have a "sentimental" awareness;
To create fantasy: yearning for a better life.
The goal of the new season of "Fanxiong Rescue" is to make people accept the LGBTQ community. In terms of exposure (Netflex), reducing difficulty, and creating illusions, it is undoubtedly successful.
The program uses Fab 5 to transform straight men (one of them is Gay) to show the ability of the Gay group. Five people with different occupations, different personalities and different identities were selected, so that people have a more "emotional" understanding of "what is gay". Because of Fab 5's personal charm, I like them.
People will remember the handsome Antoni, the cool and reliable Bobby, the charming Jonathon, the heart-warming Karamo, and the print-loving Tan.
People will not easily accept the LGBTQ community, but it is also commendable that some people have doubted their old beliefs and loosened their concepts.
Podcast 'Whispering Down' asks, is the show chicken soup for fashion or Stereotype 2.0?
From a stereotype perspective, personally, he loosens my stereotype. Because in my mind, Gay is what Janathon is. (Hey, I actually ignored Fan Ye and Bamboo Thimble). Gay reworked that episode, and the show said, "I think we're going from one extreme to the other because we're coming out and it feels like we're supposed to do whatever we want, it doesn't mean you're locked into this image, you're going to explore What suits you, if that's not what you really look like, then you don't have to dress very conservatively." Just as women are not only strong women and housewives; men are not only straight and gay.
Regarding "solving the symptoms but not the root cause", that is, some people think that changes in the environment cannot make a person's life better. All the changes in the show are based on the fact that the person being transformed has a goal to achieve (remarrying his ex-wife, coming out to his mother, raising training funds, etc.). Is there such a possibility that a person has improved his self-confidence to a certain extent due to external changes, and he has the confidence to win the approval of his family, colleagues and friends, and this kind of approval makes life a better life Dot.
In EP01, after the transformed person was transformed, his ex-wife remarried with him. Some people questioned that this is not love, and the reason is that "true love is to fully accept a person's current appearance, not the transformed appearance." Is there such a possibility that men clean up their appearances and make women feel that they are valued and remarry because they feel love? After all, accepting or not accepting is one thing, feeling love is another.
Regarding "whether or not the person being reformed needs to be reformed", I think it is okay to change it or not. Appearances are just appearances, not everyone is concerned about appearances. In addition, from the programmer's point of view, the "stereotype" of programmers is to dress casually. If you dress very formally, it will give people a "non-me group" impression.
So director, although the original cast of the second season has been renewed, can you consider changing people in "fashion"? Tan's aesthetic is too limited, and it's really not good-looking. Basically, it is completely in accordance with self-preference, and regardless of the occasion. Every time Fab5 yells "dead pretty", I'm yelling "dead ugly".
With regard to "consumerism", money is nothing more than buying pleasure and avoiding risk. Buy and buy, save the province. Your own money, "enjoying the present" or "investing in the future", you have the final say, what about others?
Regarding "home decoration", I never thought that home decoration would subtly affect family relationships until Bobby said that the original design did not belong to the male owner, and the male owner had no sense of presence at home. If you don't have a sense of existence, you don't like to go home.
About "Who would I hire if I were to pay real money"? Of course it's Bobby, needless to say? Delicate mind, rational and calm, professional and serious, people who don't want to buy a house want to buy a house and let him pretend it.
If the concept is loose and there is a gap, let us try to tear a hole. Love & Peace, yo.
PS:
Antoni: Sexuality is secondary to me, not that it's unimportant, but it's not the focus of my presentation.
Me: Gender is secondary to me, not to say it's not important, but it's not the focus of me showing myself.
PPS: I'm going to study philosophy (the science of breaking the bend straight). Antoni is so handsome, I will try to bring him home.
View more about Queer Eye reviews
