The story takes place in 1971, 46 years ago. The angles and levels of classic films must be diverse.
The most interesting point of this selection is that the Washington Post is not the first newspaper to report secrets. Ben said to Kay after the incident that they all followed you to report the matter. Kay said that we are no longer fighting alone, but the fact On the above, everyone reported after the New York Times reported and was sued. If the New York Times, the first to eat crabs, was the main line of the story, wouldn’t it be more able to express the courage and calling of the flag bearers, and finally in the industry. Cheering and hugging in group victory.
The wonderful thing is that the Washington Post is a widow-headed family, a woman who has not worked for more than 40 years and suddenly takes over her husband's inheritance and is overwhelmed. Internal and external troubles are the female-headed family. The story of the character growth of a double story - a woman's decision-making victory Highlight the invaluable significance of the victory of main story news (also on behalf of the general public). This is a women's film faked in a historical drama. The theme of the double line is Aunt May's exquisite psychological interpretation and several monologues of the two women. Kay is sitting in a conference room full of male discourse power. He stopped talking, which fueled male arrogance and neglect; kay's humility when he was having dinner with the New York Times' family, and his cautious and even slight gesture of showing weakness in the dialogue with everyone who has a working relationship, but he did not miss the opportunity to express , in the repeated expressions to obtain weak firmness; in the face of the tenderness of the children and grandchildren, and the nostalgia for her husband, these are all paving the way for the psychological motivation that contributed to her final decision. Before the incident, ben's wife wrapped his arms around his waist to analyze Kay's situation - the decision-making cost of a decision maker is not the same as the execution cost of a professional manager. If the executive loses his job, he may get his reputation and reputation back. Vanity, and the stark reality is that the decision maker lost all his property and the rest of his life in prison, and it also implies that ben, as a typical high-spirited working man, ignores a woman (he is not the only one, not even the most serious) ), a manager with professional ideals ignores the decision maker's decision difficulty and decision cost. Kay's flickering eyes, helpless memories, unfamiliarity in the cold office, and the lines that have gone through 800 times in his mind lost his courage at a critical moment, so that every woman who has struggled in the workplace has a common feeling. Affection.
Taking the Washington Post's psychological growth as a clue is sharp, contrasting, and layered.
As a main theme movie, it is still a straightforward point of the theme, which is completely expected, and is a typical Hollywood's complete structure of promoting democratic politics. A slight plus point is that I thought kay would make a soft and firm statement in the court, and finally said it through the live broadcast of the editor's phone call. There was no scene of the main court debate. Fortunately, Master Spielberg avoided this. kind of kitsch.
Another point is that the climax of the story does not appear at the end, but when ben says "run it" on the phone after receiving the decision (its climax is close to "fire!" in the shootout movie), and then the scenes after that In the scene, the worker presses the button to start printing, and the full-page newspaper runs through the conveying machine like water, shaking the entire news building as if a big event is coming. The automatically folded newspaper is sent to the sampling worker, and it is quickly bundled and packed. Cars, mail cars drove to various places in the country, and were left in the streets and alleys, and finally scattered to the houses of each household. The information transmission efficiency brought about by the industrial revolution makes people feel that the acceleration of the transmission rate of human beings in the past 100 years exceeds the history of civilization development in the past few thousand years.
In the cheers of the crowd, the debate on news ethics did not stop. News is not only an important weapon in the war of public opinion in wartime, but also occasionally spurs the rulers in revealing the truth, whether it is an accomplice or supervision, and how is national security and press freedom dialectical? This film It just gave a typical event for discussion, and finally ended in the Watergate incident. It is embarrassing. It seems that the truth can only depend on theft. However, the king of the thief, the thief of the hook, and the theft for the sake of the theft, it all depends on the baton of public opinion of history. in whose hands. The story took place in 1971, 46 years ago, there are still lies happening, and the truth is still unpublished. The people who realize it later can only find comfort in accidental victories. Is the so-called American jury that pays attention to procedural justice? Wouldn't it be swayed by the enthusiasm of the majority and the political interests of the other minority?
Finally, news, also known as gossip, is a natural fit for women who are sensitive to information, and kay, the daughter of a great banker, is able to step forward despite being out of work for more than 40 years. , it still shows the importance of the family aura, and the soft flower can still hold out the hard-core qiu branches in times of crisis.
View more about The Post reviews
