This film can't exonerate steven, but it can make people see how powerless the poor are

Arden 2022-09-08 02:17:37

The classic of this case is that the protagonist not only commits a crime once, but also a second time, so this documentary focuses on the second time. Fortunately, this documentary is in the form of follow-up shooting, many of which are first-hand information, and you can see the first reactions of the people present, so you can actually see the true reflections of the parties, who are hypocritical and who are very sad.

From the audience's point of view, the court, prosecutors, police, and some lawyers seem to be one family, and they are all working together to suppress "criminals" and try their best to use their rights to maintain their reputations.

Because "criminals" have no power, power, ignorance, and ignorance, they can easily take advantage of these characteristics, and with a little bit of use of their rights, they can easily eschew the routine case-handling procedures. The defense lawyer said that in fact, only two people, or even one person, can carry out this kind of framing. But in fact, there are many people who are silently covering up their crimes, turning a blind eye. Otherwise, how could the suspected police officer accept the case and acquiesce to the police to search the house unconditionally. This proves that the police are using the common people. ignorance for their benefit.

When Steven was involved in a lawsuit with the government, he had to settle out of court because he couldn't afford a good lawyer. When Brendan is suspected of being involved in a case, because he is poor again, he can only hire a public prosecution lawyer, and he is a new lawyer who does not think about the client. how high.

Steven Avery said in the documentary: Poor people lose, poor people lose all the time.
Many people will be very chilled when they see this, and this documentary seems to confirm this sentence.

View more about Making a Murderer reviews