genetics of memory

Lorena 2022-04-23 07:01:44

Changning Raffles re-watched it, and it was the first time (??) in my life that I ran to eat hot pot and sweated together. . . When I read it, I kept thinking, I have a dull aptitude, and I think I am afraid that I will never be able to write novels again. After so many years, I still do not understand what literature is: if art is not an appealing story for an argument to be flesh and blood, then What can art be like? Thinking about it now, this is probably because when I read Ted Jiang before, I thought he was not really good. His texts basically follow this pattern. I also feel this way when I read "The Hard Work" these days, and if you want to discuss Philosophy, philosophical texts are deeper, more cutting-edge, and more enjoyable, but what Borges is Borges is definitely not in his old-fashioned philosophical arguments. Where is the problem? Weaving into a story shell is just to let others accept and understand it with the narrative and logic in it, and even "touch people with emotion", but a work does not always need readers (not really need any The works of the reader, but there are works without love),

Reese 2022-04-22 07:01:10

In 1995, Japan was able to produce this kind of animated film about future humanity, human consciousness, and philosophy. The shocking soundtrack hits the soul directly, and sighs where the fate of mankind will go.