There are many rulers in the world. Some people use the ruler of interests to measure morality, and some people use the ruler of kindness to measure the fire of war. In the film industry, which yardstick should be used to measure the sci-fi film "Cloverfield Paradox"?
Note that I said Cloverfield's Paradox was a science fiction film because everyone thought it was a science fiction film. On the other hand, why can't it be said that it is a thriller with science fiction elements? Cables staggered across the human body, eyeballs spin, worms vomit, and the broken arm has self-awareness, which is extremely frightening.
So, is it a sci-fi movie? Or a thriller? neither. I think it is more of a family drama in a sci-fi shell: the heroine Eva, in order to save humanity from separating from her lover, experiences a series of perilous situations with her companions, "Is the protagonist dead?" Save the danger and finally complete the mission and return to Earth.
People don't really like certain old-fashioned things, pop music, fresh meat, gossip news, iPhones, etc. It's not difficult to understand that this film is full of scolding, old-fashioned things are not necessarily useless, just too much, too much, as long as you can make a lot of money, it doesn't matter whether his plot is old-fashioned or not, children watch it Will there be violent tendencies, as long as you can earn a lot of money. The director is a smart person, and is based on human nature, how can he be so popular? ? ?However, the topic of "human nature" is only a rudimentary control of primitive genes. For film and television works, I secretly thought that only documentaries can arouse people's rational thinking about history and the future (war and peace).
I wish the movie theaters were full of documentaries one day.
View more about The Cloverfield Paradox reviews
