All along, the power of ambly-sighted language , and despise unnecessary verbal disputes, so they have reservations about debating with others and debating competitions. Qiu said: The words of the old man are very bright, but this old man's words have a great influence on a culture's character tendency. But is this really the case, is it good to be harmonious and peaceful without fighting?
First, the meaning of the debate should be easily respected again. The discussion on the truth standard after Lao Mao's death was praised by the mainstream media as high and high, and the great significance recognized by the mainstream media should be acceptable to ordinary people. Nature has too many laws, human beings have too many civilizations, are so many knowledge rules and famous sayings that can be copied and used all over the world? Not to mention, there are some places where it is not needed at all, just like whether or not to walk a hundred steps after a meal will definitely not use Marx's labor theory of value; what's more, some laws (or expressions of laws) are contradictory, such as A: silence It is gold, and the truth of B becomes clearer and clearer. Therefore, it is necessary to compare, compare, and then come out what is true, and these truths are suitable for which occasions and which situations, but not for which situations and which people.
People do not deny the significance of ideological dialectics, but they may not despise such quarrels as debates. Everyone thinks that the truth can speak for itself, and there is no need to speak up. Besides, if he wins a quarrel, does it mean that the truth is in him? The fake may also win for a while, just like those stupid advertisements and pyramid schemes. But without a medium, without a form of expression, how can ideas be expressed? Telepathy? Children will not be able to suddenly see a mirror like Hui Neng, and people will become confused when they grow up and accept too many things. Words, words, and of course actions are all necessary. Some people say: Unpublished thoughts are like trees that fall quietly in a virgin forest, no one knows about them. There is a need for interaction between people, and in addition to violence, there are also ideological roles mediated by words, pictures, and sounds.
Therefore, debate should be revisited, and the art and technique of debate should be studied, and how to make it more meaningful. By studying the means to see through people with ulterior motives, if someone wants others to bow their heads and listen like a thousand horses, then there will always be some people who will find a way in this darkness.
View more about The Great Debaters reviews
