About ted
ted is smart, has a certain intelligence, and the corresponding disadvantage is that he is too paranoid, and does not reflect.
The only friend who alienated him after having a girlfriend, if he reflected after his anger, would understand that it wasn't anyone's fault but a choice, but maybe he was too lonely so if admitted it wasn't anyone's Wrong, just a choice, seems too cruel: no one did wrong, why am I still the one being punished? Why am I still alone?
So his other shortcoming is probably that he cannot accept loneliness calmly.
He seemed to accept it, but he didn't. If he can accept loneliness and not being understood, he won't want to use bombs to make others hate him. To attract attention is to avoid loneliness.
Thinking about it carefully, some people before him and after him have thought about his ideas. The idea is not unusual. What he really admires is that he really lives like that. Doing so is hard, ten thousand times harder than coming up with ideas.
He used the wrong method and overestimated his ability, that is, he thought he could really influence others.
Even if he makes the whole world understand his philosophy, no one may live like him, and no one may have the courage to reject everything and live like him, even if he expresses the idea that we are controlled by technology, this idea is right Yes, but there are two sides to the same thing. People use the benefits of technology to make excuses for themselves, and they can actually be excuses.
The so-called temptation is not a benefit. How can it be called a temptation if there is no benefit at all.
Even if we are being swayed, the choice is still our choice, even if it is a choice made by temptation.
He was sober and refused to be assimilated, and he did. But on the other hand, he actually ruined himself. This is just a way. All he wants is love, but he uses the wrong way. Or, in the last few days, he realizes that he wants what exactly is.
This is the most regrettable thing.
About Fitz
The underappreciated little policeman wanted to prove himself through this first case, and he did it, but the face of his boss on TV was disgusting. He was obviously suspicious of linguistics, but because the case was solved, he Say on TV how much you support this thing in the beginning. There was another person who, after the case was solved, bought a cake to celebrate, with his name on it, and the bomber.
He did owe his family, but he still loved his wife. After the case was solved, he wanted to call his wife first. But it doesn't matter whether his wife will give him a chance, the feelings are difficult to explain, and I can't explain it either.
That female professor is a light in my heart. Without her encouragement every time, I don't know if Fitz would be able to persevere, if he would be shaken, or if he would go crazy. It was her who was by his side every time he swayed, and this kind of feeling was really rare.
About the ending
The final expression is that we are still in the system, and that's it. I can't evaluate whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, but being in it doesn't mean you have to do the wrong thing, you can do the right thing, but your ability is limited, you can't do much, but a little is enough, one can do it alone A little bit is fine, better than nothing at all.
"Do what you want" is a relative concept, everyone knows it.
About that black policewoman
She was demoted and didn't mention what happened to her at the end, Fitz was right, she did wrong, within the scope of her job, although she did right in the sense that if she didn't, it made sense Things outside of the office can't solve the case at all. Because no one believed Fitz at the time, he simply had no way of getting the document.
But he sold her. Although she did wrong within the scope of her duties, he did sell her. There is no need to explain this. Maybe in his eyes, she just did something wrong, and he didn't consider that he couldn't solve the case without her.
I do think it's not worth it for the black policewoman to do this, really, although she contributed to the detection of the case, no one knows and no one remembers it. No one knows what she did doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but after a long time, the existence has become blurred. People will only remember the person who did the most important thing, but they ignore that the chain is linked to each other to have power. This is A little sad.
I'm thinking, if it were me, would I be like this, probably not, I don't know.
What I mean is that if the person in this role does something that is reasonable and right outside of her position, she should be recognized at least once, or she will feel unworthy.
It's not worth the risk, even if it's for the truth, and the truth is out, but not all of the work that goes into it will be acknowledged, it's frustrating, I mean, I'd be frustrating if this person was me if. It is true that some people do not care whether they are admitted or not, but only care whether the truth is solved. In fact, they are anonymous.
About all living beings
With a little talent, a little cleverness, a little sincerity, and a little balance, it is us who live ordinary in this world.
Is life a blind man touching an elephant, whether you are touching the thigh or the nose, the important thing is that you must know that you are not touching everything.
Paranoia harms others, but also oneself, ted.
It's just an ordinary person living in this ordinary world, doing something within his power, a summary of a person's life. I mean myself.
View more about Manhunt reviews
