A magical argumentative film

Jane 2022-03-25 09:01:23

How can OMG say that the amount of information is so large, and contradictions are created everywhere, all of which are big topics, and there is no conclusion without breaking it. It's amazing! It is destined that when men and women discuss love and marriage, there is no result, and the way of thinking is completely different. While discussing religion, morality, philosophy, while testing ambiguity, desire and bottom line. The most admirable thing in the whole film is the rhythm. There is no extra line. The naked flirting, saying love or rejecting are so direct, and it is so natural that it seems that nothing has happened. In France decades ago, this country has inherited a kind of What kind of cultural atmosphere? so amazing. This movie tells me that it doesn't matter if you believe in fate, it's enough to have a high emotional intelligence, and it's cool to love freedom, but it's actually the opposite of your inner desire for stability. Knowing what you want is enough, don't ask where it comes from.

View more about My Night at Maud's reviews

Extended Reading
  • Linnea 2022-03-19 09:01:11

    Rohmer's most prestigious work, bar none, was nominated for the Oscars for Best Foreign Language Film and Best Original Screenplay. Shot by Almendros, the interior scene is fine, the snow and the town below the mountain are really beautiful. Two propositions are put forward in the film: A society and politics are meaningless, B history has some meaning, and this proposition continues to "Triple Spies". The film builds on Pascal's philosophical discussion of certainty. Rohmer's feature films have since been read.

  • Isom 2022-03-26 09:01:14

    Movies are good. There are reasons for the opening bug: choosing the right guests and discussing the right content is what the organizer needs to "plan". No matter how professional the guests are, they may not understand the cause and effect of the event, and the composition and structure of the audience requires the planner to communicate with them one by one. At the scene, the curator and host has been introducing Rohmer and the guests from a subjective perspective. The sentences "I think, I personally, I think" are not objective and rational. At the same time, the lack of understanding of the guests and the emotional crisis public relations , seem unprofessional and too impulsive. This event, the guests and the audience are very helpless. Shouting friends, please respect everyone else who wants to listen to the lecture in the future.

My Night at Maud's quotes

  • Jean-Louis: My Christianity and my affairs are different, conflicting matters.

    Vidal: Yet they co-exist in you.

    Jean-Louis: In a warlike fashion. Now I may shock you once again but pursuing girls does not estrange one from God any more than pursing mathematics, for example.

  • Jean-Louis: Mathematics distract from God. A useless, intellectual diversion - worse than other diversions.

    Maud: Why worse?

    Jean-Louis: Because its completely abstract and thus inhuman.