Of course, after two hours of hard work, there is still something to be gained. First of all, in the final analysis, this film is to advise people to be kind. The so-called seven deadly sins (or seven kinds of trials), everyone spends a lifetime, and it is estimated that they have committed a lot. But whether this is really "guilty" is a consideration of motives. So the story gives a contrast, the officer buried his comrade alive, betrayal, lie, injustice, deceit, violence, murder, the motive for committing these crimes is because he is not good. In contrast, the male protagonist also committed these "crimes", but they were all based on the starting point of doing good. Beautiful lies, chasing fame and fortune for the sake of filial piety, and being forced to choose liberation under desperation, it is not appropriate to say, it is all for the sake of "Hello, Hello to me, Hello to everyone". Then there may be even bigger questions here. I think "I'm good" is easy to say, but for you and everyone, "Is it good or not". Then it has to be left to others to decide, so there is the last rule of the King of Hell, "those who are forgiven will be innocent in hell" (by extension: under the Western legal system, the role of the jury can be quite important).
Finally, I have two doubts about this movie. First, why can the messenger of hell know whether this person is a "noble person" in the first place? Second, does the Jianglin messenger know that the male protagonist's younger brother is a "noble person"? Or, when did you know?
View more about Along With the Gods: The Two Worlds reviews