The screenwriter is a real fish---analyzing the last hand

Emmitt 2022-03-25 09:01:07

1. In Mike's last hand, the river's small blind must be raised, and it is impossible to check. Selling a flaw like this, pretending that the river ace will help him, then KGB will read that Mike is in Bluff and talk about it. Unreasonable story, so KGB will be more inclined to call or re-rasie. Being a check-call all the way is more like an ambush. Checking on the river, if KGB didn't hit a set, he must have checked and opened directly. The two pairs here have no opening value. Instead, Mike would take a whole street off the value.

2. KGB's card read was a complete big fish, 50/100 blinds, pre-flop Mike from the small blind made a mini-raise to 200, the big blind called, pot 400. Basically, it can be seen that neither of the two players has a big pair (AA, KK, QQ, JJ) or AK. The flop came 6 7 10 rainbow side, the small blind checked, KGB bet 2000, 5 pots, the small blind called, the pot 4400. At this time, KGB reads the small blind and is a draw? ? ? Can a draw call? What call? Listen to the back door flower or Kashun? Obviously unreasonable, the odds do not support it at all. At this time, if the small blind is a draw, there are only two possibilities, and the probability is very low. It is either 88 or 99. The probability of hearing a straight is 8%. Counting the hidden odds, the KGB can be completely wiped out, and this hand is also very reluctant to draw. It's too reluctant to read the little blind listening here.

Then turn a grass 2, which has nothing to do with the card at all, the small blind checks again, this time the big blind plays a full pot 4400, the small blind calls, the pot 13200. If the small blind is drawing a straight with 88 or 99, and there are only 4 outs on the river, the win rate is only 12% even if you count the two outs of the middle set (not to mention that the set 3 does not necessarily win, KGB can bet 5 on the flop a big blind, possibly a set or a straight). At this time, the big blind has about 20,000 chips in the back, and even if the small blind hears a straight, the next round will be full of value, and it will still be -EV. Therefore, the possibility of the small blind being the right hearer can be completely ruled out here. From the KGB point of view, two consecutive check-calls on the flop and turn have actually shown a super strong hand in slow play. Otherwise, you can check-raise completely on the flop or turn, hoping to win the pot/test your opponent's hand as soon as possible. So basically it can be concluded that the small blind is definitely not two pair or super pair, and the range should be TT, 98, 77, 66. Even 66 and 77 are unlikely here. 66 or 77 should also be a check-raise on the turn to see if your opponent has a pocket pair of 10s, or 89s.

The last river card is an ace. According to the above card reading, it can be concluded that it has nothing to do with Mike. Mike checked from the small blind. At this time, KGB pushed All-in. So what brand of KGB can support All-in? There are only AA and TT, but if KGB holds TT in his hand, then it can be concluded that Mike has 98, so TT does not support All-in. Only KGB is left with AA and plays all the way, and then reads that Mike is TT. (Reading and drawing cards in the movie is really funny.)

3. This hand pocket AA is also very strange. Why would someone as strong as KGB face a mini-raise from the big blind and tie the call with AA into the pot? ? Apparently because: the screenwriter is too fishy

View more about Rounders reviews

Extended Reading
  • Nyasia 2022-03-29 09:01:02

    There are too many technical terms, and I don't understand Texas Hold'em very well, so I only speak from the perspective of a general audience. . . Norton is as handsome as ever! <----Shut up!

  • Dovie 2022-04-21 09:01:48

    It is also an ideal to gamble. A bad friend is also a kind of friend. Of course, I hate all this.

Rounders quotes

  • Professor Petrovsky: [sitting across from each other in a bar] I know a magician doesn't reveal his secrets

    Mike McDermott: I'm not a magician

    Professor Petrovsky: If it wasn't "magic", how did you know what everyone held?

    Mike McDermott: It's a combination of things: I was watching when the cards came out, that's just an old habit with me, it's like breathing

    Professor Petrovsky: Watch the cards?

    Mike McDermott: I watch the cards but I also watch the player react to the cards. That's how I knew the DA made his two pair and judge Kaplan missed the flush, I was watching their eyes when they checked their river cards, their faces tell you everything

    Professor Petrovsky: [Confused] you watch the man? I never knew you had to calculate so much in cards

    Mike McDermott: here's some advice, just play premium hands, you only start with jacks or better if its good enough to call you've also got to be in there raising, tight but aggressive and I do mean aggressive, you've got to think of it as a war

    Professor Petrovsky: [Jokingly] you're officially never invited to our game again

    Mike McDermott: I don't blame you, put a guy like me in that game, cards don't even matter I'll play it blind

  • Mike McDermott: [sitting across from each other in a bar] You have a respectable profession

    Professor Petrovsky: Not to my family my parents were devastated, destroyed by my decision my father sent me away to New York to live with distant cousins I eventually found my place, my life's work

    Mike McDermott: What then?

    Professor Petrovsky: I amerced myself fully, I studied everything I could about the law I felt deeply inside that it was what I was born to do

    Mike McDermott: Did your parents get over it?

    Professor Petrovsky: No, I always hoped that I would find some way to change their mind, but they were inconsolable, my father never spoke to me again