1. Some people say that BILL (hereinafter referred to as B) and cobb (hereinafter referred to as C) are the same person with schizophrenia, because in the end, the police station said that C does not exist at all, and some people analyzed that wearing gloves at the beginning of the film to get the box also implied, and returned it to evidence.
This is to be taken for granted, it is an over-interpretation, a syndrome obtained after watching Deadly ID and Fight Club too much, and if you can't explain everything yourself, it is said to be precise.
You only need to think that after B and C met on the roof, B was beaten, and in all the following episodes, you can see that B has injuries on his face. Precision? Hit the wall yourself? Go to hell.
So, definitely the second possibility.
2, the calculation is calculated, follow and anti-follow.
Regarding the police’s claim that C does not exist, and that it is B who murdered and stole money, C and the woman have already laid the groundwork in front of the bed. The police department solves the case in order to solve the case, especially the cruel crime. Say it again.
The story goes like this:
1. The black boss murdered at the woman's house, and the woman didn't go with him anymore, but he blackmailed her from time to time. The black boss was annoyed and might feel that he would kill her directly, for fear of being questioned by the police (see the woman and C First In the second shot on the bed, C said that he was questioned by the police, and the woman believed C, which means that the police were really panicking and closed the case hastily in order to solve the case. (In the bar, the black boss feels serious to the woman who has broken up when she sees her flirting with others, and smiles after slapping the face). In this relationship, C must have had an affair with the woman of his boss, because the boss is a bald old man, and C is more handsome. (C wants a woman not to have sex with B unless she has no choice but to do it anyway, which shows that women are inherently slutty, and at the same time maintain a relationship with the black boss and C, it seems very natural.)
2. C is also afraid of getting into trouble after killing a woman directly. He is a smart man, waiting for an opportunity or a plan. At this time, B appeared and followed C for a long time. In the movie, B said that when he followed the target he had followed before, all the nightmares began. This target is definitely not a woman. The meaning of this sentence is that when B After following a certain person, I changed the target, and suddenly followed that person one day, which led to the beginning of all the stories in this movie. Then B originally followed C, and after a period of time, followed C again, which led to the meeting, which in turn led to The beginning of all nightmares. Doesn't that mean that C has been anti-trailing B since a long time ago? It also shows that C has a good understanding of B, including social relations, personality and so on. Did B appear after C took the task, or did B appear long ago, and then C took the task and B followed for the second time? I think, with C's cleverness, it must be a follow-up task, and then deliberately exposed in front of B again, let B track C for the second time, and then plan later. All this is not accidental, only the first time B follows C is accidental, and the subsequent plots are reasonable and natural.
3. C brings B to see the world, implying the importance of the box, has no money to follow a self-righteous banker who is actually an unemployed person (understands that he is short of money, to pave the way for stealing money from the safe behind), signs the dinner card, and C takes B to go Women's home, see photos, take underwear, hide earrings. B takes the bait, and when the redneck sees the people in the city, everything follows C's orders.
4. B takes the bait and falls in love with a woman, and C and the woman's plan can proceed smoothly (what if B doesn't fall in love with a woman, don't forget, as mentioned in the second, C has been stalking B very early, and he knows enough about him, Knowing B's weakness, B passively falls in love with a woman, almost a certainty). The woman tricked B into stealing photos, but didn't tell B about the money, C took the opportunity to quit and distanced herself from the relationship. If you tell the rich first, C, who makes a living by stealing, will definitely be suspected by B.
5. Due to the last reason of No. 3 Middle School, B called C to ask what to bring before the action, and the answer was a hammer. The first time C took B to the woman's house, he used a hammer. The hammers in front of him all paved the way. Went to steal photos and "accidentally" found a lot of money. Under the guidance of C, B will definitely look for the bag. This is a set up scene, and the bag will definitely not be found, but just put the tape in advance, and B delays the time to tie the money. Then the bartender came in. The bartender also arranged it deliberately. If there is only a photo of the envelope, B can leave after taking it. The bartender who arranged it is not so accurate that he just went in and found B. Therefore, the money in the safe is because C realizes that B is really short of money (if It's really like what B said at the beginning, for the sake of excitement and stories, then this money may not attract B, maybe he can't find a bag and leave, which also shows that C has done enough homework), and injured the bar, the necessary factors. As for whether the bartender is dead or not, it doesn't matter, see the analysis of Q5&A5 later.
Sixth, because B opens the photo, he will definitely ask the woman, and then the woman tells him the truth, and B will turn himself in, which is equivalent to throwing himself into the net. Because B was originally timid, and the woman told C's existence, B didn't know the relationship between C and the woman before, so B turned himself in and proved his innocence. If the woman doesn't tell C's conspiracy, and B is a big deal to move and hide, who can know that B beat someone to steal money? It is because the woman told the conspiracy that B will have hope, will surrender, and will throw himself into the net. This is the most exciting part, but also the most unreasonable part in my opinion, why, see later.
7. B turned himself in. The conversation was obviously the second time. The police had already said that there was no death of the old woman. It must have been a period of time after entering the police station before the final conversation. It can also be said that C Followed B and saw that after B entered the police station, he went to B's house to exchange evidence and kill the woman. The end of the play.
Q1: C killed the woman and knocked off her finger at the same time (tortured), do the police believe that B killed the woman, took the blood hammer to steal money and injured the bar, and finally returned to the woman and surrendered?
A1: Even a normal person wouldn’t believe it. The police certainly wouldn’t believe it, but C is so hard to find, so I just don’t look for it anymore. This case is so cruel (the fingers are knocked out), so let’s just call B a criminal. It’s a political irony. The front has been paved, and it is very natural here. Moreover, it may be the case in many countries and places today.
Q2: B kills a woman, taps the finger at the same time, then steals the money, then goes to the woman's house, and then surrenders; or taps the finger first, then steals the money, then goes to the woman's house to silence, and then surrenders. If the time of the woman's death is not the same as the real time; or the time of the bloody fingers is not the same as the real time of death, will the police still believe that the case is so simple?
A2: Same as A1.
Q3: It was said in the sixth paragraph that it was the most unreasonable part, how do you say it?
A3: C is an extremely smart person. Everyone agrees. C knows that the police are annoying, and he is afraid of getting involved, so he uses a knife to kill himself and clears the relationship. In the end, he lets the woman reveal C's role in the whole thing. C does not Maybe she was so careless that she didn't tell the woman directly, then this matter has nothing to do with C. No matter whether the police investigate further, C is safe.
Q4: Regarding A3, is it possible that the woman fell in love with B in the end, only to tell the truth and ask him not to turn himself in?
A4: In the end, it may be because of kindness. The conscience cannot bear it, so I persuade B not to surrender, but it is absolutely impossible to fall in love, because I saw one: The first time a woman and C were in bed for the camera, and C laughed at B's ignorance and bait, The woman laughed so happily, "C wants a woman not to have sex with B unless she has no choice but to do it anyway, which shows that women are inherently slutty", the woman also blackmails the black boss, such a woman, she will fall in love with B and beat her to death You, I don't believe it.
Q5: How do you think the unreasonable parts in Sixth Form should be dealt with?
A5: 3 ways to deal with: 1. C warns women that they must not tell the truth. It doesn't matter whether the bartender dies or not, he immediately knocks him to death if he dies, and then kills the woman. All the blame is placed on B. B is dead, and the police can't suspect C. 2. The woman asks B to steal the photo. As soon as B leaves, C will kill the woman. Then the bartender must not die. Arrange some lights in the room so that the bartender can see B. Then call the police and arrest B. It is too late for B to move and run away. Later, I went to the woman's house and found that the woman was dead, it didn't matter. 3. The woman asks B to steal the photo. As soon as B leaves, C kills the woman. When B steals the photo, he arranges a lot of people to block B. When B is caught, he does not have to run away.
Therefore, the sixth plot is very unreasonable. In the sixth plot, C even looks like a fool. He doesn't have the feeling of being smart and close to the demon as mentioned before. Instead, he thinks, how can such a mediocre person arrange such a chain. plan of? In turn, it makes people feel that the story is unreal and affects the sublimation of the entire film. As for C's use of B's hammer to kill a woman, it's just an unnatural coincidence in an unreasonable plot. This must be Nolan's debut work, and flaws are naturally inevitable.
In a word, this is a good film, don't spray if you see it bad, after all, 90% good + 10% good, it's also good, debut, who can be worse than the debut? A good film, worth the aftertaste, otherwise there would not be so much analysis.
Summary: The only theme of Follow: Curiosity killed the cat!
B, you don't follow C, there are so many things? Don't be a writer if you don't have money (Nolan told you, not me), and don't follow!
The storyteller only analyzes whether the story is good or not, how the story itself is, and if the story is reasonable, can the movie make you see the truth, is it natural and profound?
As for the film technique, the shooting level and the picture, I can't talk about it as an amateur. Naturally, some people analyze it. I think this is just the "eye" in "the finishing touch". Without the "dragon body", no matter how good the "eye" is, it is useless .
If you have any questions or different opinions, please leave a comment, please do not black or blow, thank you.
View more about Following reviews
