This fragment has 5 points? The negative points are almost the same. The first surviving male protagonist declared war on the world, became a terrorist, and felt that he was fighting for peace. Anyway, the first part has emotional descriptions, but the whole process of the equipment upgrade in this second part is all kinds of roars. When the students saw that the elite troops killed a child, they began to defect to help the terrorists. They felt that it was just for them to take their children to survive and protect the children in the war they started. (To some extent the orphans were not caused by them) Why When I saw my classmates accidentally killed my own people, they didn't turn their backs, but just cried out in grief. The most correct sentence is that when Qiu also died, it was all over. A group of elite troops couldn't beat a group of children, and they also ridiculed their prime minister by kneeling and licking a certain country, but they were not banned. To be honest, everyone was so happy and full of hope when they saw the ending, especially the heroine of the first part came out intact to participate in the grand reunion at the ending, I just felt that those who died were all dead in vain. The heroine Kitano is also very strange. It was she who despised her father, which contributed to her father's death to a certain extent. The second part actually began to show love. The fundamental logic is very strange for a child to declare war on an adult. All children will eventually become adults, so in fact, one group of adults declares war on another group of adults. The production of the first film, those students were bad and ended up in such a situation, and the second film said that freedom of publicity should be promoted... bad should be free... The director should be happy
View more about Battle Royale II reviews
