A film supported by the actor's looks and acting skills

Jettie 2022-03-25 09:01:10

I watched this film under the introduction of a public class teacher at the university. I thought that a film based on the academic discussion of Freud and Jung would benefit me a lot, but I didn’t expect that half of the film I saw would actually have I can't stand the thought of changing the film. Not to mention the procrastination and tediousness of the whole film, I can't even find the main line of the plot. Baidu Encyclopedia says: "On the eve of the outbreak of the First World War, Zurich and Vienna were ready to use shocking methods to give mental hygiene. With a shocking blow. Freud (Viggo Mortensen), Jung (Michael Fassbender), and their common female patient, Sabina Spilerin (Keira Nye) As a patient, Sabina Spilerin was beautiful and inspired Jung and Freud; as a symbol of love, Sabina Spilerin The depths of the soul inspired these two giants in the field of contemporary psychology. However, the inexorable and chaotic relationship between these three men eventually led Jung to part ways with his teacher spiritually and academically. However, he and Buddha Lloyd's theory, however, forever changed the face of the history of human thought." First of all, I think that if this plot is from the perspective of moral love, there is no such thing as a relationship between the three people, because Freud never had any thoughts about the heroine from beginning to end. does not constitute an aspect. If it is based on academic arguments, then the union and division between Jung and Freud exist, but as for whether it is because of Sabina, I think it has nothing to do with Jung and Sabina. Before the relationship, he had a disagreement with Freud, and his ideas of some leaps made him unable to limit himself to Freud's view that "sex" is the main source of all problems, and Freud I think that all my research is rooted in sex, which is the point of his footing, and this is the aspect of his authority. Therefore, disputes and differences because of the heroine do not exist at all. For the whole film, if you want to improve academically, I advise you to watch another film. If you are because of the acting skills and appearance of the protagonists, it is still worth it. When the heroine plays the patient, some of the exaggerated acting skills really show the behavior of some patients who are suffering and involuntarily. The character restoration is also good.

View more about A Dangerous Method reviews

Extended Reading
  • Yasmin 2022-04-22 07:01:31

    The script of "Christopher Hampton" still maintains the worldview of each of his previous costume films, but unfortunately, "David Cronenberg" who collaborated with him for the first time could not grasp the spirit of the script, thus proving that costume films are still the best of "Cronenberg". Weak link~!

  • Loyal 2022-03-29 09:01:03

    The heroine's performance is a little too aggressive... Really good plot. The process by which two psychologists parted ways. But I also want to ask... Do people who study psychology fucking like cheating with patients? All have schizophrenia symptoms! Forget it, leave him alone...

A Dangerous Method quotes

  • Carl Jung: I can only tell you that she's rather disorganized, emotionally generous, and exceptionally idealistic.

    Sigmund Freud: Well, perhaps it's a Russian thing.

  • Sigmund Freud: I have simply opened a door. It's for the young men like yourself to walk through it. I'm sure you have many more doors to open for us. Of course, there's the added difficulty, more ammunition for our enemies, that all of us here in Vienna, in our psychoanalytical circle, are Jews.

    Carl Jung: I don't see what difference that makes.

    Sigmund Freud: That, if I may say so, is an exquisitely Protestant remark.