NFFA formulated the Clearing Night to remove the uncontributing people at the bottom, reduce the burden on the government, and also reduce the usual crime rate-because there is no law on the clearing night, so there is no crime, thus sacrificing the lives of the bottom people in exchange for the entire crime. Social stability - the whole society includes all the rich and those few poor who have enough force and enough luck. A man's life is deprived not because the man is heinous, but because he is at a disadvantage in a society organized on the sole principle of strength, not kindness and benevolence. This setting erases the human nature of human beings, and what remains is not only the killing between animals for the instinct of survival, but also the killing and fun in order to fill the emptiness of the soul - the person who casts a shadow on the heroine at the beginning of the film, the girl This is true of slaughter groups, people who come to America for murder trips, guillotine killers, trap-making killers, and so on. They are more evil than animals, as one man in the street shouted: "The gates of hell are open to us."
The heroine is a senator who opposes the purge plan and a presidential candidate. It's a pity that she is a mindless obedience of absolute laws. She can live to the end, not relying on the moral law in her heart (don't kill!), but killing the wicked - although she did not kill herself, but how many people have killed for her and protected her and paid their own lives what! . But it seems that the screenwriter has not let her understand this truth.
The heroine repeatedly said righteously: "If we kill him, we will be the same as him." This is an argument used to move a ten-year-old child, but a little brainstorm: NFFA people turn people into people Evil creatures worse than animals that cost innocent people their lives; and the purpose of the senator is to elect the president to stop this evil system and restore humanity. The former is evil, and the latter is good. How can a good person become the same as an evil person when he kills an evil person?
My approach will be: kill all the opponents with resistance (the one who disarms and surrenders must ensure that he is not a threat), and then leave the person in the lead, and in the future when the removal plan is abolished, he will be tried and killed by law he.
The senator's repeated sentence: I can't kill him to be elected president later.
1. If she agrees with what I said above and what I do, then her worry is justified, because if she kills the villain leader privately, the law is not enough, and the abolition of Qingye in the future will lead to continuous riots. .
2. But if she doesn't want to kill him because she insists that "the act of killing is wrong in itself, since I'm different from NFFA, and since I want to be president, I can't kill him", then the first thing in her heart is this she The absolute law that Suo believes in, rather than the lives of real people - after all, if the villain is alive, it will still threaten the lives of many people. In short, in this way, she regards the law as more important than human life.
3. If it's a bit more obscene, the senator is just worried about her perfect image among the voters, then she is very similar to the NFFA - not in killing or not, but in obtaining political gains, votes, and unscrupulous hypocrites .
In short, the basis for killing these people is not what the code of conduct in someone's heart is, but that these people themselves should be punished. I admired the black woman driving the ambulance, holding the shotgun at the brunette who came to kill at the door of the deli, the camera freezes on the ugly face of the brunette (her expression seems to have A trace of pleading and remorse, but I have no interest in it), in that short second, I was worried that the guide screenwriter was going to flood the heart of the Virgin again, and the next second saw this little black girl get shot. , simply, Liso. If in this night when all men wage war against all men, and even in the whole society in the night (is there any day to speak of such a society), man must legislate for nature and at the same time must be responsible for himself, then this small The brunette's death is also responsible for herself - but, in this crazy night, who can be responsible for life? Who is responsible for human nature?
Also, this kind of movie won't be educational, I've watched all three of them, only to see how stupid it is. At the same time, I also feel unfortunately that it brings more evil temptations, the kind of temptations that can deprive others of their lives at will. Therefore, if you are curious and look at it, you don't have to take it seriously.
View more about The Purge: Election Year reviews
