View more about Double Lover reviews
Two words after the horse
Cleora 2022-03-27 09:01:20
Every time I watch Ou Rong, I feel that the mechanism is super simple, but I should have thought of more, but the skill is still not good. So I saw the audio-visual symbols about "fragility" everywhere (light, glass, flowers, focus), but I didn't expect that the mechanism of everything is balance: in terms of the physical body, a person plays all the roles, which is itself morbid, and vice versa. It is also true that the morbidity itself is dominated by the instinct to speak for everything and explain everything, even if it ends in failure; narratively speaking, it is unlikely that there will be two or even more omniscient threads. Keep these two points firmly in mind, next time I watch Ou Rong, I will solve the case in 10 minutes.
Extended Reading
-
Andy 2022-03-25 09:01:20
The first Ou Rong is hard to comment, but let me guess the meaning of the "toto" bad comment given by the manual. I am afraid that this work is just a variant of a "popcorn" blockbuster full of fans' tributes in their eyes. It's true that it has wonderful narrative skills and audio-visual language, but there is no real emotion behind the story, and this fact is wrapped in the interlocking plot and symbols, and it is a little depressing to think about it after watching it. .
-
Kathryne 2022-03-26 09:01:12
Don't you think it's particularly like a "magic universe" story?
-
Paul Meyer: Hurts where?
Chloé Fortin: In my stomach... For once you speak. When you look at me that way... I feel I exist.
-
[first lines]
La gynécologue: Am I hurting you?
Chloé Fortin: No.
La gynécologue: Are you sure?
Chloé Fortin: Yes.