Been guessing who it is, okay.
But from the perspective of God's screenwriter, it's just arranged for a person to dress up as ordinary, the more ordinary, the more inconspicuous, the better, with fewer words, weak sense of existence, and some small stories of small townspeople. The ending was reversed, and the audience was taken aback. But the audience can only see what the director wants to see, and it is impossible to control the overall situation like the male protagonist. Then finally show the pictures outside the lens one by one, analyze the details, explain the relationship, perfect! But these ordinary people were replaced by other hostages, and they were equally established and surprised.
Because ordinary is enough to surprise.
I think it's good, but I also feel that the bedding is sufficient. After reversing, it makes sense to touch it carefully, and the overall details are okay. I feel bad because there are too many routines. The kind of cat-and-mouse game that knows who the two sides are from the beginning, a clever game on the table, feels more conscious.
————————————
very scary
as always
A year later, I can't remember the details of the plot, or that I actually wrote a short review!
View more about Flypaper reviews
