2. The first part directly intercepted the animation plot, took a large frame, and deleted a lot of details. The same amount of plot, the animation said 260 minutes, the movie only said 90 minutes. The 90 minutes of the movie directly reproduce the climax of the plot, but the details that have been deleted are the climax. In the case of live-action copying of the animation plot, the details can be deleted, but it must be deleted very carefully. The ratio of 260:90 is too amazing. When the deletion ratio reaches this level, the script adaptation must be required. The ideal situation is to follow the script framework, cut the plot and adapt it, and then refill it. The film that comes out in this way is different from the original book, but the effect will not be too bad. If you have to follow the original book, the two movies add up to 180 minutes, and you can't tell the story at all.
2. The difficulty of the adaptation of Attack on Titan is that it is a whole story, and each link has its meaning. Unlike Gintama, there is no problem with taking a unit out and adapting it to an overall story. Attack on Titan as a whole is a story, or a puzzle-solving story, it is difficult to cut out, and it is difficult to directly take a plot point and make it into a movie.
3. Compared with "Parasitic Beast", because Parasitic Beast basically follows the original plot, there is no major adaptation, but the effect is far from "Attack on Titan". Counting the deletions, Parasitic Beast is 220 (overall movie duration): 360 (overall animation duration), and Attack on Titan is 180 (2 movie duration): 555 (2 season animation duration). 220:360 and 180:555, the contrast is strong... Attack on Titan is over-cut in the absence of an adaptation (for the second part). Moreover, the original work of Parasitic Beast has a more concentrated plot, so it will not be too laborious to cut and adapt. Yanming Jun is very good at telling stories, and the conflict and climax are particularly obvious and easy to grasp.
4. Later, I re-read the plot introduction of Attack on Titan. In fact, the big plot does not seem to be brilliant, so its ultimate competitiveness should be a refreshing setting. After all, there are too many similar things on the market now, and in comparison, it is recognizable. As for the parasitic beast... Its storytelling is inherently dramatic and the setting is unique. With a little humanistic thinking, it is only natural that it will be outstanding... Its hard-core competitiveness is even greater.
5. I checked the director and screenwriter of "Attack on Titan", and they are all average... The boys who are brave to challenge... Then about the art, I feel that this art may have been tricked. After watching the trailer, the color grading and the feeling of being a giant were all correct, and I was amazed. I felt that the difficulties of the giant's real-life transformation were all solved. But when I look at the feature film, the level is different from the trailer... Either it is a problem of funding, or it is restrained by the director. He could have done better, or he had the potential. Then I checked it out, and it's called Ogami Kron, who has been nominated for 3 best visual effects. It seems that it is not far from my judgment. If you have time, let's go and see his other two works.
I racked my brains, this movie homework is so hard to do today...
View more about Attack on Titan Part 1 reviews
