There is no suspense at all. Outsiders can quickly guess the plot. They can only say that they are brave enough to face death and use death to catalyze the abolition of punishment. I can't agree with the method. Using unjust imprisonment cannot prove the one-sidedness of the death penalty, but only proves the one-sidedness of the judiciary. As the result of the judiciary, the punishment cannot be said to be wrong, but the beginning and the process of the judiciary. The death penalty can really be abolished and give you a slap in the face. In the absence of law, normal people will give the same slap based on an equivalent angle, but the slap will be light or heavy, leading to unresolved problems. However, the law is the embodiment of the will of the ruling class. In order to maintain social order and achieve class goals, the law will change the way of recovery and change to other punishments. Order, when sentencing, it is still necessary to look at the case and whether it can reflect the will of the ruling class, as the heaviest punishment - the death penalty is the upper limit of the punishment, and the death penalty for murder is an equivalent result. If the upper limit is revised, it will never wait. price. I think the most important thing is the scientific nature of sentencing, whether it can make 1=0.9... an extra 9 after it, so that people can think that 0.9... is 1 under the existing conditions. The guiding role, forecasting role, and educational role of the law will not be discounted too much.
View more about The Life of David Gale reviews
