think too much. Steve and him are two extremes, one is unintentionally influential but popularized his image values to the general public, the other is the opposite; one is the commercialization of ideas, the other is the opposite; the other is a technical idealist, One is not. It's hard to say what people love more, but some people are more wary of some things. And as a rebel, how tough does it have to be to be so aggressive? Or maybe the power does not come from the audience or the so-called democracy, but he himself thinks it should. Is it dangerous to have political ambitions and technical support at the same time? Can someone fear him with the fear of AI? The technology is pure, but the deviation brought by the idea makes him a huge question mark... And the film itself is too much like a magpie, so there is an instinctive distance. Such a high rating is more likely due to the protagonist's provocative power, rather than the conveyance of the movie. As for the authority to open public knowledge in the public domain, it is a question of ability, not of an institution. So many times, we support Prometheus to lift the ceiling because we can't touch it.
View more about The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz reviews
