2 Said that the director is an extreme animal protectionist who loves dogs and hates humans. Anyway, I didn't see it. I think the director is still relatively objective, and there is no obvious bias towards anyone. The lens is also warm, just like human eyes. When you see a person you like, it has a soft light, and when you see someone you hate, it will highlight his disgusting side. The director's shots have always been very cold and did not deliberately highlight the cute side of the dog. Even some of his expressions will make people who hate dogs hate dogs even more, and make people who love dogs have doubts for a moment. After all, humans love dogs to a large extent because they are obedient and loyal. If one day they turn ruthless and even their owners want to take a bite, will humans still love them? When I was a child, my pet bit me and cried, thinking that I loved him so much and was good to him, why would he bite me? My dad told me a passage to the effect that animals have their own habits and instincts, and animals don't think like humans. In the comments, people who are bitten to death by dogs are hateful, but they are not guilty of death. This is using human thinking to demand dogs.
3 little white dogs. The little white dog in the film is a good dog, who saved the protagonist dog, but did not join the dog's revenge army in the end, and led the way for the heroine, but was still beaten to death by humans mercilessly. This is not to criticize human beings. After all, the human beings in the film are not the audience from God's perspective. Those who have been scared by the dog will naturally kill the dog when they see it. In this way, some comments are even more ironic. They think that the dog's revenge is too much, because the targets of revenge are ordinary people, who are at fault but not dead. If the little white dog could protest, it would also say the same, but unfortunately it won't, so it will die if it dies, after all, it's just a dog. Some people's so-called equality of all beings is at best the equality of human beings. On the one hand, they slaughter dogs indiscriminately with rational self-proclaimed human beings. How ironic it is to do what no one can do!
4 The final head-up shot. The real equality is not that people abuse dogs, and dogs take revenge in return. Rather, human beings realize that they are not the masters of all things, and that those who are mastered may one day become masters in turn. The director's meaning can be interpreted in any way, even if it is superficial, the dog represents nature, human beings act recklessly against nature, and nature will come back one day with revenge, and in the face of this revenge, human beings are helpless. In the end, the director compromised and let the two reconcile, and after reconciliation, it is not difficult to imagine that the unfortunate one is still the dog, and there is nothing new under the sun. Music may represent civilization?
5 Although there is nothing we can do to change this world. But at least do the right thing, either don't keep pets (not just dogs) or take responsibility for it.
View more about White God reviews