So yesterday I opened the movie again. The advantage of experience growth is that things that were once incomprehensible are later experienced. I haven't read the original, nor the old version. It is said that "Lolita" is an erotic story, the heroine is a goblin, and the hero is a perverted uncle. So I didn't expect much from this movie, I just regarded it as a mission, but then I was deeply moved. Erotica is naturally there, but it is more subtle, and the girl's performance is in place. Innocence reveals sexy, although I think she is a bitch, but I can't help but be attracted by her beauty. As for the male lead, I never saw porn, all I saw was love. Psychology says that although the elements in many people's genes will determine the temperament and behavior of certain people in the future, past experience is more important than innate genes, and a person's past is the main factor for success. . So, when we see the male protagonist as a middle-aged uncle and a coquettish little loli incest because of curiosity, should we also explore the reason behind this? The girl part is actually very easy to understand. She is precocious, has no father, and is rebellious with her mother, so her active seduction stems from her wanting her mother to be angry, but she probably didn't expect the male protagonist to be so entangled with her. And the male lead, the director digs into his past. His first love died at the age of 14, and it became a knot in his heart that no one could unravel until he saw Lolita. The male protagonist is actually a gentleman. Probably Jeremy can't be a bad person in my eyes. It's just that when it comes to love, no one can be indifferent. This is a tragedy. Too serious feelings, whether happy or not, are ultimately dependent on pain. Even if there is no third party's participation in the middle, they can't last for a long time. After all, the girl only regards him as the object of entertainment. Even if they really love each other, it is difficult to be happy with such a gap. What's more, there is a life of the girl's mother lying in the middle. I said that all I saw in the movie was a man's love for a girl, not just sex. If he insists that he is perverted, it is also the poor man's love and obsession with passing that drives him crazy. From the beginning to the end of the movie, the man did not seduce the girl, and at the end of the movie, he just wanted her to be happy, but her euphemism that she never loved him made him completely fall into despair. tragedy. . . That's how it started. Three years later, her letter, he drove. "I looked at her, looked and looked. All my life, with all my heart, I love her the most, sure, as sure as I'm going to die... She can fade, she can wither, whatever. Can. But I only looked at her once, and all the tenderness came to my heart..." Even if she was no longer what he liked, he still loved her. At the end, surrounded by the police, all he thought of was Lori Tower. "I heard the laughter and laughter of the children, but nothing else. It's not that Lolita isn't around me that frustrates me, it's that she isn't in the laughter here. He wants her to be happy, even if he is unhappy. In the end, his redemption becomes his sin. The irony of life is that the male protagonist really loves Lolita. Playwright and impotent playwright. In the end, I just want to say that both actors are really good at acting. Jeremy is really full of drama, his eyes are so talkative. I finally know who my favorite actor is 2017-07-19 18:59
View more about Lolita reviews
