This script is solid and smooth, and the bits and pieces constitute a huge combined force for this tragedy and there is no room for relaxation. It does not stop at simply criticizing religion. The occurrence of this tragedy must be caused by the oppression of multiple forces. It seems that only this girl The only way to release the pressure of squeezing on both sides is cruel and helpless, and the calm footage matches it.
Another thing worth mentioning is the thing my mother mentioned about dogs. In the scene where Alina ate for the first time after she came, my mother said that the dog chain was broken again, and this thing could not be fastened, including telling Alina later Stop bringing the dog back with the dog you brought. The yard is all over the place, and in the middle of the movie Alina falls ill again and when the other nuns come to report to Vecchia, there is only the barking in the background. There is no real dog, the most simple and easy to understand I think the dog that can't be tied is the disorderly chaos relative to this traditional monastery. The one who brought this chaos is Vecchia, then this chaos refers to Ah Lina, and Alina is not just a pure incarnation of the so-called devil (chaos), but actually has a touch of social development outside the mountain, and various concepts that are incompatible with this traditional monastery, including but not limited to the spirit of questioning ( In their opinion, the various unreasonable behaviors are personally considered to be questioning and rebelling against this traditional religion) yearning for secular life (changed the reason why the nuns simply entered the world to buy and sell goods) and vague sexual desires, which seem to exist Homosexual desire (the super-long bear hug at the beginning, a erotic massage, etc.) is a fatal blow to the same religious system in this small country, and it also hits the priest's male dominance. In fact, Alina fell ill At that time, the dogs were completely unable to lock up, and what Alina brought was the incarnation of the mad dog, raging rampant in a small monastery. As the rule maker, the only ruler, the priest, chose to kill the mad dog. Killing Alina seems to them to be the only option, and the important reason why Alina is a "mad dog" is that she forgot to bring the law, and what she brought to this monastery is the reconstruction and regulation of destruction but no rules. For the monastery, it killed a "mad dog". For the outside world, the monastery killed people in their camp. Before that, no outsider had any substantial communication with them. Often, tragedy struck them. I remembered that there was still such a place and such a group of uncivilized people who killed our "people". It is worth mentioning that when Alina was tied up to perform the exorcism ceremony in the third quarter of the film, there was a puppy whimpering outside the window, but in my opinion, this directivity is a bit too obvious. . Indeed, from their point of view their exorcism and our normal concept of "killing the mad dog" are normal, and to emphasize how terrible it is for a religion to have a demon, you atheists Stop pointing at people from a moral high ground, where the wind is strong and cold.
And at this time, we are the outside world, and now we see Alina as a human being, just like some virgins, the mad dog will go with him when he does evil, and if something happens, he will kill the mad dog and jump out and point at it. This is a dog's life Ah so-so. To the outside world, Alina is actually just a dog, just a tool for them to speak out. The order of the outside world, that is, what Alina forgot to bring to the monastery finally appeared, but it was too late, maybe it was intentionally late. , Maybe it can't be reached before Alina's death, and after Alina's death finally has a legitimate reason to enter, it's too late. But the pattern is still not enough, it has social significance and lacks epic temperament, but this level is enough for him to be proud of the Palme d'Or. At the end of the film, the small space in the car is still two completely different people. It seems that nothing has changed, the gap is still there, and the sadness of the film is gradually exuded. Does the piece of mud at the end represent both blindfolded foolish parties? There may be greater ignorance and blindness where they profess legal order.
View more about Beyond the Hills reviews
